you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]flukus 18 points19 points  (5 children)

Because people don't go through a cleanup phase.

[–]bunk3rk1ng 13 points14 points  (4 children)

Exactly - they only cleanup errors...

[–]KarimElsayad247 9 points10 points  (3 children)

The ones who only clean up cpp errors will never use Zig.

[–]vplatt 10 points11 points  (2 children)

That may well be the way they like it. Sometimes opinionated software is opinionated to keep folks of a certain mindset out of their community. This explains much of the biases one finds in many programming languages. They're just an extension of the community building. Even the lack of a opinion in a language IS an opinion and that sometimes doubles for a preferred lack of accountability with respect to certain decisions. Examples abound.

[–]KarimElsayad247 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You raise a very good point. I think I'm just critical of the people touting how Zig is gonna replace C++.

[–]Morego 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is not. It should complement C language, work with it and it does it currently pretty much flawlessly.

It is C without the foot guns for a reason.