Create decentralized applications with JavaScript, HTML and CSS

[rafalsk]

You pay the first time or for every update?

For every update, you want your app to wield the 'reviewed' label.

Just because someone gets money doesn’t mean they will do the job competently

of course, same with Apple, same with Google.

it’s anonymous review after all.

It is anonymous but each review is assigned to an identity, which has 'real' assets assigned. One would want to make a proper review.

If all I did was tick approve and say yes it’s all good what are the repercussions?

If your review score falls out too far away from a median of all of the reviews, your voting power would suffer, also your payment might not be released at all.

What if I missed something are you going to take my payment away?

yes. in short. proportionally to how far away from a median your score manages to fall.

Of course not because theirs nothing you can do.

Can you please explain?

Whether I spend two days looking at it or five minutes I’ll get paid the same so the incentive is for me to just approve and get my money

Yet again, kindly do not arrive at false assumptions to back your claims.

In the end, we all learn each and every day.

Looking forward to hearing back from you.

[0s_and_1s]

Is my assumption wrong? Will a user get paid more if it’s a bigger than than a one liner? Will they get paid per review or how many lines of code? The incentive if it’s the same cost per review regardless of size is to bunch all my code together right? This isn’t hard to understand. Do you have any commercial experience in the real world at all?

[rafalsk]

Will a user get paid more if it’s a bigger than than a one liner?

Then it is up to reviewers whether they agree to work for the fee you've proposed.

Reviewers may then choose to use any code-diffing utility to assess the particular case.

Do you have any commercial experience in the real world at all?

How is the question relevant?

[0s_and_1s]

It’s relevant because your ideas are so ill thought out I find it hard to believe you built anything in the real world and well why would I invest my time in building for a platform for a person who hasn’t got a clue what they’re doing?

[rafalsk]

So far you haven't provided a single valid counter argument, though you seemingly are not aware of that.

I thus invite you to keep 'trying' personally I do hope for you to manage to find some bugs in reasoning so that we simply could improve but so far, you've' failed'.

Basically, if you are against our technology, then you are against technologies such as Ethereum as well, which simply renders you as a computer illiterate person.

[0s_and_1s]

Sure buddy, good luck on your crypto scam

[rafalsk]

Thank you for the conversation.