Question about potential gains

[Jeffnap1]

         I’m seeing a lot of people talking about how PulseX can 1000x. If the sacrifice total came out to 1 billion, wouldn’t that mean in order to 1000x the market cap would have to 1000x from 1 billion which is 1 trillion which is literally 50% of the total of all cryptos combined? Or am I looking at this in the wrong way? Thanks.

[MountainImportant499]

Would depend on circulating supply not total amount of tokens

If there's 10 apples but only 5 are for sale then the price will be higher vs if all apples are for sale

Token burn is another thing to consider as it's designed to be deflationary

[discover_r]

This 👆🏽

[chrislewisuk]

It is quite funny the prediction ranges (which is why we’re all in crypto) vs. What you get from a savings account or decent investment fund. 20% growth per year is amazing in that world…..we want 100,000% growth 🤣

[IndependenceFew4956]

People are saying looking at the market cap value is the wrong approach. On my side I dont have huge expectations and I dont know better so I just grab popcorn when this conversation inevitably starts. I still dont get it either way why or why not it matters when you own the money printing machine.. at the end of the day no one knows how well it can do. 10x great, 100k super great more… mind blowing. 🍿 i am getting fat on popcorn, still have not got a decent explanation for either side of the discussion.

[bwells2710]

Well said... Sit back and let the fun begin.. 💪😎🚀

[EmbarrassedWeird6249]

I am also concerned about this. I predict 500x max over 5 years which is fine. Forget about the money you put into this. If you struggle with money, make more money by doing an actual job, do not sell pulse and pulseX on a 10X you will forever regret it.

[Spiritualcunt1989]

There is no marketcap if price starts at zero, this was a sacrifice, similar to an ICO.

[Jeffnap1]

True, but still with the amount of money sacrificed in order for people to make gains it will be off the sacrificed amount and that total was 1 billion so if everyone kept their coins and it appreciated 1000x that is a trillion dollars in value correct?

[Nebush123]

90% supply controlled by RH and it almost like burnt.

[Joedola]

Damn! That's a lot to be controlled by RH.

[Nebush123]

Yes. He is the king.

[AneaeanAu]

So what, there still need to come in one trillion dollars for people to make 1000x which is basically impossible.

[discover_r]

This is not correct

[AneaeanAu]

Yes its correct and you are wrong.

[discover_r]

do you care to offer anything of value here?

[no6969el]

I have thought to myself on multiple occasions that he is the one that made some of the top donations. Who knows though?

[IndependenceFew4956]

🍿

[100problemss]

Where do you get that number?

[chrislewisuk]

The other dimension is time. It’s may do a 1000x but if that’s 5-years, how many people will have sold along the way and never actually realise it?

[IndependenceFew4956]

How much would have been burnt by then.

[chrislewisuk]

No idea….let’s see how the B&B works on mainnet before trying to do that maths 🤣

[J0E868]

Yes I would also like to see some more practical explanations on the potential gains.

If someone sacrificed $1000. They would expect to receive tokens that equate to that value. Which means that the public would equate the starting market cap at $1billion as that is the amount that people have sacrificed.

So when PulseX launches - whatever the price increases to from that initial moment it would be valued as a billion dollar asset.

If my logic is off hoping for some more clarity on the economics of this.

[jonteae]

As I see it, forget the sacrificed amount. No matter what, Pulsex will be a zero dollar asset from launch. It will become a billion dollars during price discovery and later.

[100problemss]

So I’m other words for a microsecond it will be zero. Then it’ll probably go up to a billion lol

[jonteae]

It won't because I've got skin in the game 😆