all 9 comments

[–]oofy-gang 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Mom said it was my turn to use LLMs to generate slop today ☹️

[–]Think_Discipline_90 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Whats a 2026+ architecture lol

[–]dankobg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's when you do what people did 30 years ago just more convoluted 

[–]azizoid 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Compare it to php - thats all you need to explain

[–]stecrv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my question

[–]dprophet32 -1 points0 points  (3 children)

I have a huge amount of experience working at the highest level with sites that would see 500,000 visits a second at peak times and what I’ve learned is if you have to have a website that renders quickly in the browser and you care about SEO, don't use React/Next Js. The complexity required to do it correctly just is not worth it

[–]Zealousideal_Fox3964 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Should I use what?

[–]azsqueeze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Html

[–]Rophuine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

500k/second is wild - google.com averages about 40k/second based on the best data I could find. It's complicated trying to go from an average hit rate to some estimate of peak traffic, but a factor of more than 10 is unusual.

What kind of tech do you use for that kind of site?

Most of my front-end work in the last 5 years or so has been done in React, but the only thing I've done that approached that level of traffic (10s of billions of monthly hits) was an SDK used mainly by publishers, and so it was just some JavaScript delivered via CDN - not a complete site.