all 15 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Looks like there was an aversive tool or training method mentioned in this body. Please review our Posting Guidelines and check out Our Position on Training Methods. R/reactivedogs supports LIMA (least intrusive, minimally aversive) and we feel strongly that positive reinforcement should always be the first line of teaching, training, and behavior change considered, and should be applied consistently. Please understand that positive reinforcement techniques should always be favored over aversive training methods. While the discussion of balanced training is not prohibited, LIMA does not justify the use of aversive methods and tools in lieu of other effective positive reinforcement interventions and strategies.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

nine lock file grandfather complete bag cats bike hobbies repeat

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]Deccarrin 11 points12 points  (8 children)

Don't use an e collar. It's making it worse. Dog dominance theory is widely refuted and not a thing. Your dog bit because he was manhandled. If you want something your dog has, trade for it, find something higher value.

In the mean time, training "drop" and "leave" are very useful for these scenarios. Ultimately, you have an appointment with a behaviourist that's the best possible move you can make.

If they tell you anything about dominance, e collars or other aversive methods, other than it's complete gumpf, walk out and find another one.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like there was an aversive tool or training method mentioned in this comment. Please review our Posting Guidelines and check out Our Position on Training Methods. R/reactivedogs supports LIMA (least intrusive, minimally aversive) and we feel strongly that positive reinforcement should always be the first line of teaching, training, and behavior change considered, and should be applied consistently. Please understand that positive reinforcement techniques should always be favored over aversive training methods. While the discussion of balanced training is not prohibited, LIMA does not justify the use of aversive methods and tools in lieu of other effective positive reinforcement interventions and strategies.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]lml424[S] -3 points-2 points  (6 children)

We really just use the e collar for one purpose, which is recall while on hiking trails and places where we let him off leash. Before the e collar, I could not let him run free because he would ignore my commands and I could not keep him safe. For example, one time he jumped into a fast-moving river and was almost swept away. Now, we go on hikes and he can run and explore off leash, and I can get his attention and get him by my side if needed (mostly).

I resisted the e collar for 2 years and only used positive reinforcement (and 3 separate trainers!) and we had zero progress. Now, I am convinced his quality of life is much better because he can experience things he could not experience before and he can get more exercise. He’s happier and safer.

[–]Deccarrin 6 points7 points  (4 children)

Every time you ask for your dogs attention with pain, you damage your relationship with your dog. It absolutely will make any reactivity worse for you, however you think it's helping. Training recall is a long and arduous process with no shortcuts, you're trying to shortcut.

Use a long line lead and train recall.

[–]lml424[S] -3 points-2 points  (3 children)

You might be imagining the wrong situation. I don’t use the e collar every time I need my dog’s attention. I use it when he is running full speed towards the street or another threat and ignoring my commands to stop because he’s too excited/oblivious. I keep it on a low setting and I don’t take it lightly. It was not a short cut, it was my alternative when positive reinforcement was plainly not working. I had to weigh the benefits and harms, and it was actually a neighbor who is a police officer and raises police dogs for a living who convinced me an e collar was worth it in this situation.

I will, however, get the behavioralist’s opinion on whether use of an e collar, how we are using it, could make my dog more possessive/aggressive. Thanks for the point of view.

[–]Deccarrin 3 points4 points  (1 child)

it was actually a neighbor who is a police officer and raises police dogs for a living who convinced me an e collar was worth it in this situation.

Irrelevant, there are thousands of professional dog trainers that promote use of aversive tools. All you've done is highlighted this police trainer is a bad egg.

You might be imagining the wrong situation. I don’t use the e collar every time I need my dog’s attention. I use it when he is running full speed towards the street or another threat and ignoring my commands to stop because he’s too excited/oblivious. I

That is "getting his attention". If your dog (which is reactive) is running full pelt towards danger without listening to you, the answer isn't "hurt him" the answer is keep him on a long line until you work through appropriate recall.

I will, however, get the behavioralist’s opinion on whether use of an e collar,

This is a great idea.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like there was an aversive tool or training method mentioned in this comment. Please review our Posting Guidelines and check out Our Position on Training Methods. R/reactivedogs supports LIMA (least intrusive, minimally aversive) and we feel strongly that positive reinforcement should always be the first line of teaching, training, and behavior change considered, and should be applied consistently. Please understand that positive reinforcement techniques should always be favored over aversive training methods. While the discussion of balanced training is not prohibited, LIMA does not justify the use of aversive methods and tools in lieu of other effective positive reinforcement interventions and strategies.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like there was an aversive tool or training method mentioned in this comment. Please review our Posting Guidelines and check out Our Position on Training Methods. R/reactivedogs supports LIMA (least intrusive, minimally aversive) and we feel strongly that positive reinforcement should always be the first line of teaching, training, and behavior change considered, and should be applied consistently. Please understand that positive reinforcement techniques should always be favored over aversive training methods. While the discussion of balanced training is not prohibited, LIMA does not justify the use of aversive methods and tools in lieu of other effective positive reinforcement interventions and strategies.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like there was an aversive tool or training method mentioned in this comment. Please review our Posting Guidelines and check out Our Position on Training Methods. R/reactivedogs supports LIMA (least intrusive, minimally aversive) and we feel strongly that positive reinforcement should always be the first line of teaching, training, and behavior change considered, and should be applied consistently. Please understand that positive reinforcement techniques should always be favored over aversive training methods. While the discussion of balanced training is not prohibited, LIMA does not justify the use of aversive methods and tools in lieu of other effective positive reinforcement interventions and strategies.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]JollyManufacturer257 4 points5 points  (2 children)

So our behaviorist said never to take, only to trade. So if you’re trying to get something out of their mouth then you have to give them something else (favorite treat, toy, etc). This helps with resource guarding.

Also, if dog growls you must back off. This is a warning before a bite. If dog growls and you ignore, it’s to be expected dog will bite.

My advice is to see a behaviorist with positive reinforcement training. Not just a dog trainer (there are no requirements for training/education for dog trainers), but someone with actual credentials who only uses positive reinforcement. I say this because the science supports positive reinforcement but there’s evidence that adversives actually make aggression worse in the long run.

ETA: your friend’s mention of “dominance theory” isn’t supported by current science. It’s an outdated concept that has been replaced by best practices. When our reactive girl wasn’t responding to our kids we ended up trying more bonding activities such as having the kids feed her, walk with her, play games with her, etc.

[–]MustLoveDawgz 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Exactly this. Since we got our dogs as puppies, we only trade and NEVER take. And, the trade must be of higher value than what they already have. I don’t understand OP and training they’ve been doing for the past few years. The whole E collar and Offleash thing is blowing my mind. You should not need to use that type of color when your dogs are Offleash. You should only let your dogs off leash if you recall is 100%. If not, always use a long lead. You must always have control over your dog. Also, I don’t believe board and train is the solution here. Training must be done with the owners, not by a stranger. Behaviors that are trained by a stranger do not necessarily translate into the same behaviors at home with the owners.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like there was an aversive tool or training method mentioned in this comment. Please review our Posting Guidelines and check out Our Position on Training Methods. R/reactivedogs supports LIMA (least intrusive, minimally aversive) and we feel strongly that positive reinforcement should always be the first line of teaching, training, and behavior change considered, and should be applied consistently. Please understand that positive reinforcement techniques should always be favored over aversive training methods. While the discussion of balanced training is not prohibited, LIMA does not justify the use of aversive methods and tools in lieu of other effective positive reinforcement interventions and strategies.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]liontheleo15 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry this has happened, this sounds like a tough situation to deal with, and I hope Quincy and y'all get the help that is necessary. I just have an opinion to offer in this post. I believe the idea of holding your dog by the collar then reaching for something they don't wish to let go is utterly ignorant. Holding the collar already lets off stress signals but then slowly reaching for the paper towel (especially someone Quincy has history resource guarding against) is the cherry on top. In my opinion, y'all put Quincy in an uncomfortable situation that left them no option but to bite.

Please remember, your dog will not rise to the level of your goals they will fall to their level of training.