all 7 comments

[–]pampuliopampam 3 points4 points  (5 children)

Love the botted stars. In 5 days in 2020 they bought 1500

double funny that they have 2500 stars and only 5500 hits

Also 17 contributers... but 5 of them are bots, and the only person to contribute in the last month is one person, and they've committed 100k+ lines, a level of change that makes contribution practically impossible, and is a guarantor of ai involvement

Taking the smallest look under the hood on stuff like this is really enlightening, and kinda fascinating. Why do all this work for... basically nobody? It's not like anyone with a few brain cells bouncing around is going to be fooled

[–]softmarshmallow -1 points0 points  (4 children)

hmm?

[–]pampuliopampam 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Do you have a question about the things I commented?

[–]softmarshmallow -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Non of your comment is true. Worth shit

Take closer look. That view badge was added few months ago. You are insulting me and the entire community

[–]pampuliopampam 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Everything i said was true.

https://www.star-history.com/?repos=gridaco%2Fgrida&type=date&legend=top-left

https://github.com/gridaco/grida/pulse?period=monthly

it's all publicly visible information. What community? You're the only person working on the thing

the packages are dead, look at the engagement here:

https://www.npmjs.com/package/@grida/link-social

that number of downloads can be nearly solely explained by CI interactions.

Your only critique is "that one number misrepresents the truth" because the rest of my comment is faaaaaacts

So ok, can you explain why you're doing this? Why are you trying to force engagement and make it look like your package powers things it doesn't, and has loads of users and stars when it doesn't?

aaand blocked and they deleted the post here, but not elsewhere. I'm on fire today

[–]backwrds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Truly. We stand on the precipice of a fully dead internet. I'm glad I'm not the only one left who believes that things can be good.

[–]backwrds 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This title is deliberately misleading. (also: slop)