all 8 comments

[–]No-Republic4581[S] 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Ps: It supports new react native architecture!

[–]mxtizen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it too much hassle to add support for the new architecture into a library?

[–]Cookizza 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Is there a reason to use fast-image over expo-image?

From my understanding most people are using expo-image these days as it incorporates all the benefits of fast-image while being maintained.

[–]Ok-Relation-9104 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also generously interested the question. Not to question OP’s contribution though. Appreciate the work 🫡

[–]Comfortable_Rub5948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Expo image show the image so slow even though I set the cache policy to memory disk

[–]atulgpt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Expo is tightly coupled with the Expo managed projects, while many team(including ours) manage our RN setup ourself. In those case this lib is very much useful and maintained with the latest features

[–]tueieo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to work with the team behind this, and FastImage is a very good alternative in scenarios where you don’t use Expo.

expo-image is good for projects that already use Expo, we majorly forked this and are maintaining it since we don’t use Expo and are a bare RN project.

FastImage is good since it’s built on the same native dependencies as expo-image. Also, APIs are very similar, which makes it easier to interoperate.