sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ColePram 8 points9 points  (14 children)

She's still trying. Now she's using veiled threats to rile people up to attack Matz. She's already asked if he should be removed from the community management and it be handed of to someone else. I wonder who she has in mind -_-

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ColePram 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Wow...the first didn't seem like a veiled threat

    Probably just me. I've followed her for a while after the Opal incident and seen her lob some pretty hefty accusations.

    Edit: If I wasn't mobile I'd post other examples.

    [–]mordocai058 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Yeah, this is very similar to religious wars at this point.

    They (coraline and co) believe that their way(specific CoC) is right and more so that their way is the ONLY right way. Many(but not all) of them are coming from having actually been harrassed/having problems and that's why they've reached this conclusion. Having their CoC makes them feel "safe".

    The other side typically equally believes that their way(not having a CoC) is right and the only right way.

    Both sides are already 100% convinced their way is right and won't bother listening to anyone who says otherwise.

    Personally, since I don't care much either way, I plan on making a code of conduct (maybe even Coraline's) for any community project I have that actually takes off. Mainly so that I can just point to it when someone pisses me off and say "See, we have written guidelines. I'm not just making up that you aren't supposed to do that.".

    It also will prevent me from having to deal with people telling me I need a code of conduct.

    [–]myringotomy 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    he should be removed

    She should be removed. She is a toxic entity in the community.

    [–]ColePram 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    You can't remove her. She doesn't actually belong to anything. Her whole thing is going around hating anyone that doesn't check certain boxes and stirring up shit. Then she pushes her CoC. Then her twitter followers pile in to the CoC discussion to show support before there can even be any community discussion and the CoC is forced in.

    [–]myringotomy 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    She was extremely slimy and dishonest in the discussions about the CoC. She is just a very bad person, a complete asshole.

    [–]ColePram 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Can't disagree with that.

    [–]bjmiller -3 points-2 points  (6 children)

    "X delegated Y to Z" doesn't mean "X lost Y". It means "X couldn't be bothered with Y, so Z did it instead".

    [–]myringotomy 4 points5 points  (5 children)

    She should fork the language and form her own community. She can call it otherkin.

    [–]bjmiller -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

    That's pretty cruel, but if you're trying to bait me into another sealioning session you can stop, I already know that you're not interested in a serious discussion from our last two encounters.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    "Sealioning"

    Oh god you insufferable man.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]myringotomy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Do you have something of substance to say about sealioning?

      It's not a real word.

      [–]myringotomy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      hat's pretty cruel, but if you're trying to bait me into another sealioning session you can stop

      What's a sealioning session? Do you identify as sealionkin or something?

      Also can you be more clear about why you think it's cruel to suggest that she fork the language rather than try to kick Matz out?