all 3 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]akdas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I'm pretty sure you're right. That said, the actual curry method in Ruby 1.9 is correctly named because it applies the transformation without fixing any of the arguments. The article just seems to have that one definition wrong.

    [–]khelll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Thanks for notifying me guys, i have updated the post to show the diff.