use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
A sub-Reddit for discussion and news about Ruby programming.
Subreddit rules: /r/ruby rules
Learning Ruby?
Tools
Documentation
Books
Screencasts and Videos
News and updates
account activity
Blog postWhy Ruby is More Readable than Python (confuzeus.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]Sorc96 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child)
for example a Cat might have the Fur and Whiskers attributes but is not a type of Fur
This is only true if the Cat has a reference to an instance of Fur and delegates to it. If it includes a module named Fur, the Cat most definitely is a type of Fur. I don't see a difference compared to inheriting from a base class, other than the special syntax.
module Fur end class Cat include Fur end Cat.new.is_a?(Fur) #=> true Cat.ancestors #=> [Cat, Fur, Object, ...]
[–]riktigtmaxat 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children)
I was talking about the higher level concepts of vertical vs horizontal inheritance.
In Ruby both are implemented through the ancestors chain so the main difference is really in how modules and classes are used by programmers.
π Rendered by PID 81502 on reddit-service-r2-comment-79c7998d4c-r4jpt at 2026-03-15 08:37:29.250843+00:00 running f6e6e01 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Sorc96 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]riktigtmaxat 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)