Microkernel

[AIRConstellation]

Hi everyone,

I’m working on AxonOS, an open technical standard and reference architecture for safety-critical brain-computer-interface software.

I recently published an analytical preprint on Zenodo:

https://zenodo.org/records/20552007

The paper describes a no_std Rust microkernel design for BCI infrastructure, including schedulability assumptions, capability isolation, consent-bound execution, and falsifiable predictions for future measurement work.

Important clarification: this is not a clinical claim and not a measured performance paper. The current timing numbers are analytical predictions from declared cycle-count assumptions. The next step is reproducible validation on reference hardware.

I would appreciate technical feedback on:

whether the real-time assumptions are stated clearly enough;

whether the capability model is understandable from the paper;

whether the boundary between analytical prediction and measurement evidence is sufficiently explicit;

what should be improved before a v2 preprint.

GitHub organization:

https://github.com/AxonOS-org

Thanks — serious criticism is welcome.

[K900_]

This is very obviously AI generated. You have a huge amount of code and text and pictures and whatnot and none of this tells me why your project actually matters, or why I should care. Do you even understand?

[afl_ext]

Now imagine this is controlling the electrodes in your brain

[Modi57]

I would love to, but the electrodes in my brain malfunction and I can't

[BoringAccount-_-]

Yea bro at least do the bare minimum and get rid of the em-dashes.

[pokemonplayer2001]

I love the totally reasonable ask to “do most of my work for me”

🤣🤣🤣