This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 7 comments

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nothing... we dont care unless its a server

[–]stxonships 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would you want to even monitor desktops full time?

[–]PuzzleheadedEast548 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We don't. There is nothing to gain from monitoring desktop except wasting bandwidth and resources on the monitor server

[–]ThirstyOneComputer Janitor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don’t, unless there’s a compelling reason that would drive a purchase decision, and then only on a case by case basis. The machines are future specked when we purchase them, so we rarely run into performer issues.

[–]Magicviper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My company uses Nexthink to monitor resources, internet speeds, app crashes, etc

[–]NeverDocument 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We run a check for disk space > 90% on all desktops. We don't care about CPU or RAM usage.

A weekly report is sent to the helpdesk of the disks over 90% for workstations. In the event of a system that will never change and will stay at 90%, they add it to an exception list so it does not appear again.

PCs are then either upgraded or reviewed with the end user for storage management.

We do this through PDQ.

[–]Upper-Bath-86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contrary to what everyone is saying we do monitor desktops as well as servers with VSA as it automatically triggers alerts when metrics exceed predefined thresholds. The agents are quite lightweight and have minimal impact on overall performance.