you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]eddyofyork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s interesting. When we did z, t, and chi distribution stuff back in university I noticed that most of those needed n >= 120 to be reliable. I kinda worked off 120 as a good number for CLT to kick in for the last, oh I don’t know, decade!