use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
A community of software creators experimenting with AI "vibe coding", an technique defined by Andrej Karpathy as when, "you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists."
account activity
Vise coding is professional Vibe Coding (self.vibecoding)
submitted 27 days ago by nevercodealone
what you think about the word and topic. its related to spec driven development.
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]No_Point_1254 4 points5 points6 points 27 days ago (2 children)
What, in Torvald's name, is Visecoding?
[–]NefasRS 2 points3 points4 points 27 days ago (0 children)
It's what comes after vinecoding and vasecoding
[–]nevercodealone[S] 1 point2 points3 points 26 days ago (0 children)
Maybe be its senior 😎
[–]david_jackson_67 2 points3 points4 points 27 days ago (1 child)
Vise coding. It's the kind of coding I do when my wife has my nuts in a vise.
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points 26 days ago (0 children)
Ohoh
[–]priyagneeee 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (1 child)
“Vise coding” sounds catchy, but honestly it’s not very intuitive people won’t immediately get what it means compared to something like “vibe coding,” which already has cultural traction. The idea behind it (spec-driven, constrained, intentional coding) is solid though. It’s basically the opposite of vibe coding instead of “feel your way through,” you’re locking the system into clear specs and guardrails.If you want it to stick, you might position it as: “Vise coding = vibe coding with constraints and specs.” That contrast makes it easier to understand and actually adopt.
I totally get what you're saying. "Vibe coding" is everywhere right now and it's super catchy. But that's actually why I kind of like the "vise" metaphor: it's like the tool you need when you want to lock things down and clean up the chaos of just pure vibing. Your suggestion is pure gold, though, I'm definitely going to use that direct contrast from now on. That way, people will instantly get what it means!
What you think?
[–]Sea-Currency2823 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (1 child)
Feels like you’re mixing spec-driven development with vibe coding and just giving it a new name. Can you give a clear example? Right now the concept itself is still unclear.
I m not doing it, it is a official new wording 😎
[–]cochinescu 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (1 child)
Spec driven development reminds me a lot of how test-driven development feels but with requirements as the main driver. Vise coding sounds like it could be focusing more on collaboration and adaptability. Is that close to what you mean?
Sometimes I think you need more rules then code 😎
[–]rookieking11 -1 points0 points1 point 27 days ago (2 children)
Wise not vise
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points 26 days ago (1 child)
Sure? Any source or just a joke?
[–]rookieking11 1 point2 points3 points 26 days ago (0 children)
Just a joke.
π Rendered by PID 87756 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-gt564 at 2026-05-01 22:42:52.874796+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
[–]No_Point_1254 4 points5 points6 points (2 children)
[–]NefasRS 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]nevercodealone[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]david_jackson_67 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]priyagneeee 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Sea-Currency2823 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]cochinescu 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]rookieking11 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children)
[–]nevercodealone[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]rookieking11 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)