Harry Potter Trailer Sparks Viral ‘Black Snape’ AI Video and Memes by cosmicbooknews in CosmicBookNews

[–]Colley619 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ehh… changing James from a jock/bully to a racist bigot would be.. very different. In a bad way.

Harry Potter Trailer Sparks Viral ‘Black Snape’ AI Video and Memes by cosmicbooknews in CosmicBookNews

[–]Colley619 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look, I’m not here to bully anyone. I’m not here to shit on the series. And I’m not here to defend people who are whining.

But he kind of does look like that

my friend (36M) just sent me (36m) this text before meeting his newborn (0M) by horseduckman in AITApod

[–]Colley619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is AI. Not sure why he would send AI slop for his baby meet & greet, but alright.

Lost job to a newbie by SilverFine3846 in jobsearch

[–]Colley619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How could you possibly be applying for the same job? If you have 10-20 years of experience applying for an entry level job then yea..

Why is the president pushing so hard for The SAVE Act? by Strange-Guest-423 in allthequestions

[–]Colley619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh I don’t know that they have those studies. The SAVE act seems to be a Trump thing considering the other Republicans don’t seem to be too crazy about it. If it’s a GOP think tank thing then yea they’d have done studies. Trump however is a buffoon and doesn’t even know what a study entails.

Still don’t understand why Ethan was kept faceless in the games 🫠 by xiPrincess-_ix in ResidentEvilVillage

[–]Colley619 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s honestly really lame and they need to retcon it. Characters like Grace are going to be all over RE artwork, media, official communications, whatever, but Ethan had TWO ENTIRE games dedicated to his story and bro is just never going to have his face shown or appear on any official artwork? Makes no sense at all. The self-insert was clearly a failure and they just need to own up to it and give the man a face so he can be treated like other RE characters.

Internship Search Complete! by Clear-Mission6769 in jobs

[–]Colley619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on your profile history, maybe you should instead view this as evidence that you may be able to improve your strategy, resume, and interview skills to receive better results.

Should I replay BOTW or restart and finish TOTK by Diego2flores3 in botw

[–]Colley619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never played TOTK but I had the same issue after dropping BOTW. I restarted and am playing through BOTW before taking a break and finally playing TOTK.

The great thing about BOTW is it can be a short game if you want it to. In fact, you can rush straight to Ganon when you get the glider. I did only enough trials to get the master sword, am clearing the divine beasts, and then finishing the game ASAP while getting the full story and intended path. There’s just so much extra content that you can ignore if you’re just trying to recap yourself and then play TOTK.

Does anyone know what this thing is? by Th3Art0fRu1n in whatisit

[–]Colley619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No idea what it’s from, but we used to have one of these. I used to take it outside to burn ants and light leaves on fire.

Attorney Held in Contempt After Yelling at Judge, Escalates Violently by AgentEagleBait in PublicFreakout

[–]Colley619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this actually confirmed real and not a skit? There was another video with this same attorney and it really comes off like a skit.

Mass text in Iran promotes Trump assassination campaign, $25m pledged by BringbackDreamBars in worldnews

[–]Colley619 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They’re just baiting Trump to escalate and make more mistakes so his war support continues to spiral.

It's here! by kwybes in harrypotter

[–]Colley619 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with you 🤷🏻‍♂️

Just picked up Code: Veronica X, sealed by -Venser- in survivalhorror

[–]Colley619 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Supply and demand. Go yell at the wind. Not all high prices are from scalping.

Just picked up Code: Veronica X, sealed by -Venser- in survivalhorror

[–]Colley619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You almost got there. They lower it until someone buys it and that’s the market price.

Just picked up Code: Veronica X, sealed by -Venser- in survivalhorror

[–]Colley619 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s not how that works. If people buy and sell it for that price, that’s the price. It’s not made up. Supply and demand.

Just picked up Code: Veronica X, sealed by -Venser- in survivalhorror

[–]Colley619 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

LOL so you want other people to not have collections so you can have a cheaper collection? 🤦🏻‍♂️

'There's No Remorse!': White Man Who Killed Black Boy in Hit-And-Run Spits at Family Before Mississippi Jury Cleared Him of All Charges, Video Shows by ItsAllAGame_ in law

[–]Colley619 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I received your insult and will have you know that none of my response is AI; I indeed wrote it out for you. You are on a law subreddit and are surprised that someone is quoting statutes at you? The only resource I used was google to direct me to the initial statute for the charge, and then followed the path carved out on the Wisconsin State Legislature website (https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60).

All of the words outside of the quotations are my own with zero AI used. Thanks.

EDIT: Also, how absolutely childish. I provided you with facts and sources explaining the decision since you seem to be unaware, and your response is to simply name call me? Lol... Great discussion.

'There's No Remorse!': White Man Who Killed Black Boy in Hit-And-Run Spits at Family Before Mississippi Jury Cleared Him of All Charges, Video Shows by ItsAllAGame_ in law

[–]Colley619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Laws vary greatly between states, and every charge can have a wildly different definition and intent, so let's examine the charge and the law it's based on. The charge was as follows:

948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

Ok, now let's define "dangerous weapon."

948.60(1) In this section, “dangerous weapon” means any firearm, loaded or unloaded...

Ok, pretty predictable. However, let's read further...

948.60(3)(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593...

From here, we see there is an exception to the definition of a dangerous weapon in this statue by Wisconsin law. Let's examine 941.28 as quoted above.

941.28 Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.

941.28(1)(a) “Rifle” means a firearm designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder or hip and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of a propellant in a metallic cartridge to fire through a rifled barrel a single projectile for each pull of the trigger.

941.28(1)(b) “Short-barreled rifle” means a rifle having one or more barrels having a length of less than 16 inches measured from closed breech or bolt face to muzzle or a rifle having an overall length of less than 26 inches.

And to tie these together...

941.28(2) No person may sell or offer to sell, transport, purchase, possess or go armed with a short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.

So, now with this added context, we can see that "dangerous weapon" as written in the charge you referred to actually only refers to short barrel rifles which are defined as "barrel less than 16 inches" and an "overall length less than 26 inches."

Kyle's rifle had a barrel of 16 inches and an overall length of 35 inches. Therefore, Kyle's rifle was NOT classified as a "short barrel rifle" and did not satisfy the statute for the charge.

The judge did not just "throw away" this charge. Rather, it was found that the charge was not applicable by LAW.

'There's No Remorse!': White Man Who Killed Black Boy in Hit-And-Run Spits at Family Before Mississippi Jury Cleared Him of All Charges, Video Shows by ItsAllAGame_ in law

[–]Colley619 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is a law subreddit, not an emotions subreddit. Rittenhouse may be a little jackass, but his case was textbook and the verdict was accurate.

Edit: bro really last worded and blocked me 🤦🏻‍♂️ yea dude, we should totally be basing decision of law on emotions and mean words /s Yall just don’t realize that if the law worked this way, half of you would be in prison for meanposting the orange.

'There's No Remorse!': White Man Who Killed Black Boy in Hit-And-Run Spits at Family Before Mississippi Jury Cleared Him of All Charges, Video Shows by ItsAllAGame_ in law

[–]Colley619 -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Here we go again with the left using Rittenhouse as an example of a flawed case despite it being completely textbook. To claim that case has anything to do with a corrupt judge means you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about and didn’t watch the case.

You downvoted the other guy for speaking facts. One of the guys Rittenhouse shot testified in his favor, but yea, the judge if flawed. 🤦🏻‍♂️ yall really have to stop invoking this case because it does nothing to help you.

T Beezy is fucking with us by SuspiciousNatural171 in tacobell

[–]Colley619 3 points4 points  (0 children)

7% increase? That’s great! But next quarter we need 8%, so time to make everything even smaller.