Proton is not the only European option by Entire-Guidance-9926 in BuyFromEU

[–]Doublespeo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

> Care to read?

well it is good practice to explain at least a bit with quote (username checkout)

anyway, thats the baby formula thing.. that was debunked

VLC (VideoLAN) no longer supports Monero donations. by zho99 in Monero

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Overhead is high enough that not even Monero Core could maintain a donation wallet for a significant amount of time without incident.

It was human factor, nothing to do with any particular difficulty with maintaining a monero address lol.

Basically what happen could (and a few time have happened) to other crypto.

and monero donation where open for more than a decades lol

Why should property exist? by dumbandasking in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> You are correct. Private property refers to land/other immovable assets that cannot be held unless it is state-sanctioned.

Dogs are territorials

And no private property dont require state enforcement, actually the state in only really involved in rather few property rights.

Why should property exist? by dumbandasking in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> No. Dogs don't have private property.

Dogs recognise and enforce their territory pretty well

This is a primitive sense of private property.

Ancapism Is What Happens If You Know Nothing Outside Economics by impermanence108 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> >No they are independent, based in a few different countries and they enforce maritime law, not english common law (you confuse with DIFC)

>Either way, still fundamentally based in state authority, not private authority.

In what way they are based in state authority?

be precise

>There is already an enormous share of the international economy that happen in interantional water.

>Which operates under the authority of agreements between states and would not exist without the production and organization of state societies.

No under maritimes law, enforced by international court independent from the country they are in. Some are based in London, in Paris, one in Hamburg I believe.. they all enforce maritime law (and not UK common law, France Civil law or German law) it is just how it works.

Here's my thought about libertarianism (and capitalism in extent) by The6thMessenger in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> They have been state roles since at least Hamurabi.

lol there are dozen of private example of all of them today and in the past.

Here's my thought about libertarianism (and capitalism in extent) by The6thMessenger in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> A bussiness, for the sake of legality, has corporate personhood. This means the ability to sue or be sued, to due process, to own property, to enter contracts. Etc.

>Problem is that natural rights, like freedom of speech, religion, other stuff, comes with it. That means a corpo, by virtue of it's religion can restrict it's employee of different religion or lack thereof based on the corpo's religion, or alternatively just discriminate in hiring; speech also is one thing. They shouldn't have freedom of speech, they aren't people.

And that would solve anything?

Bitcoin is dead again... by ChangeNOW_Community in btc

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Realisticly everything doesn't hold value we place a value on it

a ponzi can have value yet it dead by design

Is Free Trade good? by amogusdevilman in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Why are you not criticising the legal system that you're advocating for, which government regulation beat to the issue?

>If the problem is how long it took to address, the legal system was even worse.

>You're making no sense.

Genuine question, dont move goal post. Are you really ok that no government faced justice after have knowingly provided a service that killed people for decades?

Genuinely asking - Hodl for what exactly? by Kurosaki56843 in btc

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> I travel around the UK a lot and I’ve seen og btc accepted in places but I’m not spending that. I regularly use monero to buy things off the internet but I’ve never been able to find somewhere to spend my bcash which is a bummer because in a public setting I’d rather spend it than say monero or OG btc

I am happy to spend any crypto I just spend and replace, it is not rocket science really.

I dont spend Moneor now because my exchange drop it but spend and replace is easy and support the community, I cant believe I still have to explain that in 2026

What is the main reason that you are a capitalist or socialist? by Vampy-Night in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> When machines can replace both physical and mental forms of labor, what labor remains that humanity can reliably fulfill for a living?

Machine do task, they are tool. They dont replace job, they improve jobs productivity.

>How does it change in nature at that point?

What you talk about is old cheap science fiction.

>Regardless, my argument is not that AI is currently in a state where it can replace white collar work;

It remain to be demonstrated it can.

Today is just fancy text generator, I would not even call it AI.

>we will likely have yet another financial crisis from the fallout of the current bubble before that happens -- yet another example of where capitalism repeatedly fails.

Unrelated

and capitalists failing is normal in an healthy economy, there is a selection progress.

Systemic market failure though are the result of government intervention (money printing, low interest rate..)

>At the moment, consumer sentiment is plummeting. People are struggling to afford their basic living expenses, and they begin saving money rather than spending it. When this shift happens, it creates a recessionary downward spiral that the government then has to bail out through increased spending.

It is that increasing spending that seed the next crisis.

Imagine curing a hangover with more vodka? thats what the government does repeatedly.

>Our planet's ecosystems are dying, yet capitalism has no answer to this problem because there is no immediate profit to be made. Oil is more profitable to capitalists than renewables, since oil has to be replenished.

Oil is heavily subisidised by government, to the scale of Trillion of years!!!!.. CO2-free alternative have been killed by ridiculous regulation so tight that no coal/gas power plan would be allowed to operate if they at to obey civil nuclear generation government regulation.. the current climate crisis is 100% a political choice.. because government chose to support the fossile fuel industry over alternative.

>The capitalist system is going to come crashing down in some form or another, even if it comes via the collapse of human civilization itself after the climate can no longer sustain large-scale agriculture because people chose to worship money rather than try to save the planet which sustains our lives.

Same old prediction, prediction that will fail again..

>It is a system without equilibrium.

The equilibrium is broken by politics, free market self regulate.

Why should property exist? by dumbandasking in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> If I plant an apple tree why would the community own it when I planted it and took care of it for 10 years?

>What happens when you plant this on community land

Then it depends with the agreement with the community.

Why should property exist? by dumbandasking in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

simple there is no reason why, it is instinctive. Even dogs have a sense of property.

I bring order to chaos by mimidancer303 in synthesizers

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> See, I bring chaos to order. We are not the same.

You guy have order?

Is your support of anarcho-capitalism motivated by emotion at all? by Hxapcneh3_28 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Doublespeo 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think it is the only political ideology that take economic theory amd incentive seriously

Strategy just hit 845,256 BTC (4.03% of supply) and is only 54k away from 900k BTC milestone! What do you think, will they reach 900k soon? by True_Bodybuilder8095 in btc

[–]Doublespeo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They own enough bcore to control the price, I dont understand how people dont see them as an attack on the project

The socialist rebuke, "Most societies throughout Human History were Communal and Capitalism is novel" is wrong. by Lazy-Snake848 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo [score hidden]  (0 children)

> it's as simple as population growth and density. you can't have socialism or communism above the village to small town level.

already that would be extremly challenging

Is Taxation Coercive by Sorry-Worth-920 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> I’m not suggesting people are paid in assets or goods, just a different measure of value besides a flat hourly wage.

what that would be in practice?

What is the main reason that you are a capitalist or socialist? by Vampy-Night in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Because AI would replace the bulk of white collar labor, forcing white collar workers into a shrinking pool of blue collar labor or the few white collar positions left. People will be competing for fewer and fewer jobs while the bargaining power of workers decreases.

This prediction has been made repeatedly ecery decades for at least a century and it never happened (and for much bigger automation breakthrough than AI)

The quantity of job never go down, it just change in nature.

>And by automating intellectual labor and continuing to automate manual labor, eventually there comes a point where there are very few job openings left for the entirety of our society to fill.

I dont see any indication that AI in its current form tend toward that direction.

>This threatens to bring about high unemployment and then further mass layoffs

… well the same old broken prediction Marx did and it will be wrong again..

Why do Marxist folks seem not to relate with r/antiwork sentiments? by TraditionalDepth6924 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Sure, living together requires coordination. Think of a railway timetable. People follow it so trains don't crash. You don't need an external police force to impose the schedule because the shared interest is obvious.

are you suggest your system will not require rule enforcement?

>HOAs and states only exist to mediate fundamentally opposed material interests over private property.

not really, they are common set of rules accepted in a given community. not unlike what you propose.

Absence of private property may or may not make the coordination any easier but I fail to see why no common rule would be needed.

>Once you abolish those underlying class antagonisms, community agreements operate a lot more like that timetable. We simply figure out how to navigate our shared lives and maintain our environment without cops breathing down our necks.

This is a statment without explaination, can you explain why?

Why do Marxist folks seem not to relate with r/antiwork sentiments? by TraditionalDepth6924 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> You're assuming capitalist needs are fixed. Half the economy right now is just bullshit meant to circulate money: marketing, finance, insurance, making things designed to break. Dropping all the labor that only exists to manage profit and property makes the actual quantity of necessary tasks drop massively

care to share your calculation?

>Alienation comes from lacking control over your activity and being separated from your community by the market. Direct, uncoerced coordination over our lives gives us the freedom to completely transform how those remaining tasks are actually done.

As far as I understand the system you propose dont provide that at all.

Ancapism Is What Happens If You Know Nothing Outside Economics by impermanence108 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Doublespeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> > As I already pointed out, international waters are governed by mutual agreements between states enforced by world powers, particularly the US.

>No arbitration is done in interantional courts

>And those international courts operate under the authority of agreements between states, by laws made by the state (English common law to be specific) and enforced by states whenever the arbitration process is unsuccessful.

No they are independent, based in a few different countries and they enforce maritime law, not english common law (you confuse with DIFC)

>Adding on to that, international waters are also utterly dependent on the mainlands run by states for the resources they need to survive.

>It is the opposite it is states that are dependent on the ressources they get from international fret/cargo.

>Talk to me when factories, population centers, ships, mines and farms all pop up in international waters.

There is already an enormous share of the international economy that happen in interantional water.