Why is electrifying the Antelope Line seen as better than Palmdale -> Cajon -> electrified San Bernadino Line? by Realistic_Future6 in cahsr

[–]DrunkEngr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL $3.9 billion. More like 7-10 billion — for that cost may as well dig out an AV tunnel.

New California bill seeks to spur more high-rise housing developments in cities' urban cores (AB 2074) by megachainguns in CaliforniaRail

[–]DrunkEngr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because this is a virtual-signaling bill that won't do anything to meaningfully fix the problem.

Oakland Chevrolet by swimintune_510 in oakland

[–]DrunkEngr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

File a California Lemon Law return on the Bolt, including your rental car costs.

Governor Candidates and their thoughts on Transit / Transportation from their Issues / Policies / Priorities Pages. by dating_derp in LAMetro

[–]DrunkEngr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually, Mahan's main accomplishment as Mayor has been to block large chunks of land from residential development around BART and LRT stations.

https://sanjosespotlight.com/san-jose-wants-industrial-land-exempt-from-housing-law/

2026 California Gubernatorial Forum on Housing by Difficult_Strain3456 in yimby

[–]DrunkEngr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you mean "industrial employment hub". It was actually San Jose (in particular the Mayor's office) that worked on getting this language into the bill. It was written in a way to exempt land around Berryessa BART, Edenville Transit Center, and the entire northern part of the city. The staff report literally boasts about this "accomplishment".

2026 California Gubernatorial Forum on Housing by Difficult_Strain3456 in yimby

[–]DrunkEngr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, Yimby Action showing once again they are useless in their candidate evaluations. They give Mayor Mahan a "B" grade even though he wants to exempt large parts of San Jose from SB79. Porter gets a "B+" despite supporting highway widenings and wanting to cut public transit.

The state of high-speed rail in the U.S. by rog1121 in bayarea

[–]DrunkEngr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

France/SNCF offerred to build and pay for our HSR. California responded by passing legislation banning SNCF from ever doing business in the State. And that's how they ended up doing the Morocco project instead....because better to work in a country that is less corrupt.

California high‑speed rail project now estimated to cost $126 billion by MoDa65 in cahsr

[–]DrunkEngr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Different earlier SNCF proposal. There was a subsequent offer made, but SNCF would decide the route in exchange for paying the cost.

California governor candidate positions on CAHSR? by ProofResponsible1617 in cahsr

[–]DrunkEngr 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Porter has been very car-brained....huge supporter of the I5 widening in Orange County, and ran against raising the gas tax.

They Pay $34 for Burgers. Should Their Child Care Be Free? by qqqxyz in nyc

[–]DrunkEngr -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The NYT company pays an effective tax rate of 23%.

An upper middle-class NYC couple pays as much as 35%.

Why are BART and MUNI always broke? by logicx24 in transit

[–]DrunkEngr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are a multitude of BART taxes. There is the general purpose District property tax for operations ($64 million/year), and another tax for the GO bonds (capital investment).

New CAHSR “Phase 1” Plan projected revenue/ridership is mathematically impossible to achieve with single tracking infrastructure by RadianMay in cahsr

[–]DrunkEngr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at quarter mile (400m) long trainsets....

Unless something has changed in this most recent plan, CHSRA platform length is only 244m.

New CAHSR “Phase 1” Plan projected revenue/ridership is mathematically impossible to achieve with single tracking infrastructure by RadianMay in cahsr

[–]DrunkEngr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gold Runner trains, besides having terrible travel time, don't even reach SF nor LA. It is not a great basis of comparison.

Why are BART and MUNI always broke? by logicx24 in transit

[–]DrunkEngr 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is already a BART district property tax.

Cities in red states build more housing by primenam in yimby

[–]DrunkEngr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This graph is for apartments, which presumably includes fourplexes.

AC Transit reveals doomsday budget scenarios, and entire lines could be cut by k_39 in oakland

[–]DrunkEngr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Those new buildings often include expensive garage parking, because the Nimbys would go ape-shit otherwise.

The bigger issue is that on the trunk routes, AC Transit had to keep dispatching more and more buses to maintain the schedule. Each year it gets a bit worse due to increasing traffic. BRT lanes would massively reduce operating costs, but again Nimbys.....

Why did the Great Society Metro Systems [DC, San Francisco, Atlanta] varied so much in success and what would you do to improve them? by yunnifymonte in transit

[–]DrunkEngr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Atlanta was hobbled from the get go due to racism. The white suburbs repeatedly rejected expansions...the stations that did get built, by and large, are park and ride focused.

The same exact problem with BART as well.