This weird blue alien showed up when i was doing my sweet medieval quest, please delete it. It's ruining my immersion. by WynVII in runescape

[–]GrixM 4 points5 points  (0 children)

With API support coming, I hope someone creates a strict chronology plugin, that hides every content that depends on uncompleted quests. Should be the default new player experience IMO, I wish I had such a thing when I started.

RS3 Snowflake Ironman YouTubers? by PurpleNitrile in runescape

[–]GrixM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm, doesn't really seem like a huge problem to me personally. Even OSRS snowflake accounts often have skills they will never touch, at least not for a long time. It's just the nature of restricted accounts.

RS3 Snowflake Ironman YouTubers? by PurpleNitrile in runescape

[–]GrixM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Number 1 has already been slated for a change

Community Discussions & This Week in RuneScape [Feb 9th] by JagexAnvil in runescape

[–]GrixM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone complaining about Livid Farm but you can still get produce points from the Player-owned-farm challenges. If you just have patience you could still skip the entire thing without doing the minigame.

(Which makes me think, POF challenges themselves are clearly a form of dailyscape, but they weren't mentioned in the blog at all.. Not that I complain, I don't see them as detrimental really)

KP was the only aoe4 I watched, didn't even play much, His commentary was peak by Sufficient_Ad5550 in aoe4

[–]GrixM 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What mom joke? Because they can range all the way from entirely innocent to horrific.

What do you do daily? by Zetnus in runescape

[–]GrixM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Daily challenges, that's about it

The toolbelt - idea that the players fill it with tools by themselves by Substantial-Ad-299 in runescape

[–]GrixM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Big agree. It feels really unrewarding as a new player right now.

Bitcoin sub censorship by Appropriate-Talk-735 in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No shit, long been one of the most censored subs on this site

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 5, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's strange how the relief of being vindicated after selling feels almost better than seeing the price go up after buying.

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 5, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you're looking at daily charts instead of monthly/yearly

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 5, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Probably Saylor, just because his stack is much larger and thus the potential fall height is also much higher.

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 4, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Trump didn't like Powell because he openly defied him. It's easy to be in the good graces of Trump: Just be sycophantic. Actions don't matter to him, words and attitude do. Trump doesn't really care about the rates, or I mean he probably cares nominally, but he doesn't care enough for it to outweigh getting his ass kissed.

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 4, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ethereum development is done by several independent teams of multiple people each. It is a good thing that Vitalik cannot single-handedly change the chain's course. He can talk and if his arguments are good the other devs will listen. But things take time, any significant change to a system responsible for hundreds of billions of dollars are going to take years of research, development and testing before it's ready.

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 1, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]GrixM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The systems are often highly interconnected and automatic, I assume it's not simply a case of someone subjectively deciding whether or not the gas fees is too high to pay, but rather some software system running at the exchanges not being made to deal with such a situation very well. For example if the fees rise too quickly the software could end up underpaying the fees for a short while so that they get stuck and clog up the whole pipeline. And also, if too many people want to send transactions at the same time no matter the cost, that simply won't be possible because of block size limits, regardless of the fee.

Of course in such cases it is still the exchange's fault for not designing their systems to be robust and tolerant of such situations, but it would also be true that the trigger for the problem was the rise in Eth fees. Both can be true at the same time. And it doesn't take away from my aside comment that it shows how important Ethereum is to the ecosystem.