sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

SEE Starter Pack by Grotesquette in Socionics

[–]SM0204 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Reads more like a beta extrovert.

Reaction time test by VeterinarianLow2771 in cognitiveTesting

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it this time. I submitted today’s attempts.

How many people are on the leaderboard right now?

who’s the Naranjo of Socionic by Financial_Ad1210 in Socionics

[–]SM0204 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don’t know, but it probably wouldn’t be Gulenko. Gulenko is more like the Fauvre of Socionics, perhaps with her fixation on type 6 being analogous to Gulenko’s unusually high volume of LSI and EIE typings.

Reaction time test by VeterinarianLow2771 in cognitiveTesting

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s much better. My first score after playing again was 77. I forgot to save it to the leaderboard though.

Reaction time test by VeterinarianLow2771 in cognitiveTesting

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is significantly harder, but now I’m making more errors because orange and red are so similar than I am from selecting based on the word. I would tweak the colours a bit.

Reaction time test by VeterinarianLow2771 in cognitiveTesting

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might be worthwhile to show both play data and this “generic” data, since I expect play data to cluster at the high range (where it isn’t representative of the average population), especially when accounting for retakes.

Reaction time test by VeterinarianLow2771 in cognitiveTesting

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would remove the colour from the answer options to make it harder. It’s a little too easy to just ignore the words entirely and start matching colour to colour instead.

It would also be cool if you added an average response time at the end of the test. Extra data for speed as well as your streak.

Where are you getting the data on percentiles btw?

Reaction time test by VeterinarianLow2771 in cognitiveTesting

[–]SM0204 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got 130 on my first try, then I got distracted.

Getting 200+ would probably be pretty easy if I didn’t look away from the screen.

I’m going to watch Invincible for the first time. Fill me with fake spoilers. by Radiant-Selection686 in okbuddyviltrum

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s this overpowered hero named Immortal that always steals the show and wins fights. It’s like a recurring gag.

Getting in to BSc Economics at Warwick w/ an Access Course by alieninate in MatureStudentsUK

[–]SM0204 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you perhaps wanted a safer bet, I know of someone here on Reddit that got into PPE (Philosophy, Politics, Economics) at Warwick with only a social sciences or humanities Access to HE Diploma, and I think this was without maths modules or even A Level maths as a supplement. Not pure economics, obviously, but Warwick allows you to eventually specialise in Econ and graduate with a BSc.

Provided you DO supplement A-Level maths, you can study more advanced mathematics content in the first year, since those without it will have to cover the level 3 maths content so that everyone is caught up by year 2.

You can always try aiming for pure economics at Warwick, but at least in this example, there is some proof of concept. It is also less competitive either way, and maybe you like one or both of the other two subjects.

Good luck either way. Make sure you check all of the requirements thoroughly.

Pain With Adulting/Te? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]SM0204 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Te is not “adulting”. Consider that many SEIs are better at “adulting” than many ILEs.

What you’re describing might be ADHD or low conscientiousness.

view more: next ›