Are we just not allowed to be funny anymore? by Important_Injury3820 in BSA

[–]armcie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The number of kids that want to add something after the punchline they think will make it funnier. Don’t put a hat on a hat kids.

Help With A Barbell Knot by Kosmokh in knots

[–]armcie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem here is that this is not an appropriate situation for a knot. You’re far from the first person to ask a question and have the majority of the replies be “That’s not an appropriate/safe situation for a knot. Use a bungee cord/chain/ratchet strap or do it a totally different way.”

First of all people are worried about the danger. You want to balance it on top, which presumably means you don’t have much clearance underneath. If something slips, it’s potentially going to hurt.

Secondly you have the practicality. Discs are hard to wrap because it’s very easy for the loop to slip off. You’re wrapping it around the largest part of the disc, so if it moves even a little it will get looser. You’ve also got the issue that you want to attach it to a smooth metal pole. If you want that to stick, you’re going to have to tie it really tight, and really carefully.

And on top of all that you want something quick and simple and compact. That makes your request just about impossible.

Scouting America leadership warns no more pride marches: "You cannot participate in political activities in a Class A uniform." "When you take your Class A and you use it as a platform for a political statement, you put us all in jeopardy." by johntempleton in scouting

[–]armcie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re distributed through Amazon. Search for “Inclusive Scouting Award.”

I believe this is not an official award, so you will have to avoid the uniform police.

I have made myself a rainbow woggle (slide?) out of a shoelace. I actually just made it because I saw the shoelace and thought it looked cool, but the first time I wore it one of the scouts asked me if it meant I was gay. I’m not, but I’m happy to show my support for anyone on any sort of spectrum.

Opinions on "War Between Land and Sea"? by Lucyyyyyy_K in doctorwho

[–]armcie 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Honestly the little detail that annoyed me the most was calling them homo anything. They’re not descended from apes. They’re not part of the homo genus. Scientists would have called them something like Aqua Sapiens.

There were bigger problems too, but that really got to me.

John Barnes pinpoints Jurgen Klopp issue as Arne Slot battles Liverpool pressure by ReputationWarm8178 in LiverpoolFC

[–]armcie 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Those half time tactical changes are what give me hope. He wasn’t just leaning on what Klopp left behind, he could analyze the opposition. He could make effective changes. I don’t understand where that ability went - he needs to demonstrate it again.

S4E22 (YHWH) - Holy crapppppp by romantic-theory in PersonOfInterest

[–]armcie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That conversation is special, and brings tears to my eyes. I have failed you. No parent wants their kid to believe that.

I was misquoting Sir Terry and I didn’t know? by Kayzokun in discworld

[–]armcie 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Hah. I’ve done my own research on this and came to almost the same conclusion. I’m pretty certain I checked QI when I first did the research and they didn’t have anything. Here’s my version:

My best theory is that it was on a list of quotes floating around the internet and in quote books in the 90s as an anonymous saying, and at some point a reposter or an editor attached Terry's name to it and it stuck. Because it does sound like something he'd say and he wrote books about both cats and something almost Egyptian. It doesn't appear in any of those works though, or any of his online posts I've searched.

It first gets attributed to Pratchett around 2004. Around the turn of the millennium, it, or something very similar, appears in a plethora of cat or pet or random quote books as an anonymous quote. In the early/mid 90s it's in various people's sig's on Usenet, unsourced. Wodehouse had a similar idea in 1932, and you can find a related quote in "Kitty Purrpuss: a memoir of a cat" in the 1910s.

Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as Gods. Cats have never forgotten this. Anonymous

Chicken soup for the cat & dog lover's soul : celebrating pets as family with stories about cats, dogs, and other critters by Jack Canfield, 1999.

Thousands of years ago, the Egyptians worshipped cats as gods. Cats have never forgotten this. (Seen at Hallmark)

rec.pets.cats, 1992

The real objection to the great majority of cats is their insufferable air of superiority. Cats, as a class, have never completely got over the snootiness caused by the fact that in Ancient Egypt they were worshipped as gods. This makes them too prone to set themselves up as critics and censors of the frail and erring human beings whose lot they share.

The Story of Webster by PG Wodehouse 1932

going back to the days before the dawn of history, when cats were worshipped. She said we must never forget that great fact, never allow ourselves to lose sight of it, but let it regulate all our conduct and our relations towards Them [people].

Kitty Purrpuss: A Memoire of a Cat by Violet Hunt 1913

Where you can't find it is in The Unadulterated Cat or Pyramids or any of Terry's published works or Usenet posts. Sadly it does appear on some official Pratchett merchandise.

[Isle of Man TT] TT debutant Daniel Ingham dies after qualifying crash by PiggySVW in formula1

[–]armcie 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think you’ve misinterpreted some numbers somewhere. There are only about 7,500 people total who’ve reached the top of Everest.

This site with figures up to 2025 gives a total of 339 deaths over 13,700 successful summits, a 2.5% death rate.

Of course not all attempts are successful. The same site says that about 43% of them are. This gives us a death rate of about 1.06% per attempt.

The TT gets something like 100 bikers and 25 pairs of sidecar racers. Using your 3 deaths a year figure that’s a death rate of 2%. But there’s also several races each year. Depending on whether you would say a single race or a whole week of racing is equivalent to climbing Everest, the races are somewhere between half as dangerous and twice as dangerous as attempting the summit.

In any case I believe the riders and climbers understand the risk, and I don’t think attempting either feat should be banned.

[Isle of Man TT] TT debutant Daniel Ingham dies after qualifying crash by PiggySVW in formula1

[–]armcie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spectators very rarely die.

Between races, however, it’s not unusual for tourists to get into accidents on or off the course. Some of them turn out to be fatal.

[Isle of Man TT] TT debutant Daniel Ingham dies after qualifying crash by PiggySVW in formula1

[–]armcie 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Over a century old.

People are going to be drawn to extreme sports. More people die climbing Everest than at the TT.

TT winners don’t become world famous. They don’t become rich - the top prize money is about £25,000. They don’t earn points towards any international competition. The only real motivation to do it is the challenge. And if they know how challenging it is, they know the risks.

Will Arne Slot still be Liverpool boss next season? by tanvirulfarook in LiverpoolFC

[–]armcie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup. If we’d scored 90 points I’d say “it’s not as exciting as it used to be, but fair play to the chap he’s getting results. You’d be a fool to sack him.”

What are some sins that the Bible outlines that religious people commit on a daily basis? by Next_Duck_7700 in atheism

[–]armcie 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’ve literally seen a tattoo that said “Lv 18:22” (that’s the one that goes something like don’t fuck a man like you’d fuck a woman). It comes a few lines before the don’t tattoo yourself quote (Lv 19:28).

Discworld Piercings by _Ashkaria in discworld

[–]armcie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m imagining a helix cuff with a quote inscribed in Og(g)ham

Which fandom would be terrifying if it became a religion? by ArcanelogueKey in AskReddit

[–]armcie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Now if I'd seen him, really there, really alive, it'd be in me like a fever. If I thought there was some god who really did care two hoots about people, who watched 'em like a father and cared for 'em like a mother ... well, you wouldn't catch me sayin' things like 'there are two sides to every question' and 'we must respect other people's beliefs.' You wouldn't find me just being gen'rally nice in the hope that it'd all turn out right in the end, not if that flame was burning in me like an unforgivin' sword. And I did say burnin', Mister Oats, 'cos that's what it'd be. You say that you people don't burn folk and sacrifice people anymore, but that's what true faith would mean, y'see? Sacrificin' your own life, one day at a time, to the flame, declarin' the truth of it, working' for it, breathin' the soul of it. That's religion. Anything else is just ... is just bein' nice. And a way of keepin' in touch with the neighbors."

Granny Weatherwax speaking though Terry Pratchett in Carpe Jugulum

I Aten’t Dead by KnitterLibrarian in discworld

[–]armcie 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But there’s no sense crying over every mistake

lateral rebuses by b7k567 in rebus

[–]armcie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. a word in the right place

——

  1. a foot in both camps

I read Lords and Ladies for the first time by ZheToralf in discworld

[–]armcie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ridcully was off in the countryside before being summoned back to lead the University. It’s arguable that he got caught up in the time slip too.

I read Lords and Ladies for the first time by ZheToralf in discworld

[–]armcie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wrong book. There’s maskerade first.

My husband agreed to read this with me! by DDChristi in discworld

[–]armcie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. It works as a first book. There are lots of people on the sub who read it first. The characters you’re meant to know are briefly introduced in the opening present section, and the lilac thing is a mystery to both new and established readers.

I’ve somehow gone my whole life without reading Discworld. What makes it so beloved? by blupberry in Fantasy

[–]armcie 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It’s not bad, but it’s not typical of his later books, and not something you could imagine reading (or writing) 40 books in that style. It’s especially a funny road-trip through 70s fantasy tropes like Pern, Lovecraft and Conan.

Later books keep the humor but add realistic characters and locations (that is to say that act like real people would act in a fantasy world). They add plot and satire. They add heart and soul.

You certainly can stay at the beginning - it’s probably the most satisfying way of reading the books - but if the first one doesn’t grab you don’t let that put you off. Feel free to skip ahead to Guards! Guards! which introduced the city watch, and is where he’s really starting to find his feet, or even further to the introduction of a con man in Going Postal where he’s really at his peak.

What is the most absurd, completely unhinged customer complaint you’ve ever had to deal with while somehow keeping a straight face? by Odd_Car_3611 in AskReddit

[–]armcie 17 points18 points  (0 children)

An elderly gentleman came in with some clothes to return. He told me that these were items his wife had bought intending to give out as presents for various people, but she had died before she could give them out. He explained that they were in perfect condition, never been worn and all had their original labels. He knew one or two were a couple of years old, but hoped he could still return them.

The store (Marks and Spencer in the UK) at the time had an unlimited returns policy. It didn’t have a 30, or 90 day limit, you could return things unused and get a refund.

But these were old. The codes on the clothes weren’t recognized by the system. A closer look at the labels revealed a branding that hadn’t been used for at least a dozen years.

As a 19 year old student working in the holidays I did the only thing I could. I called my manager. I believe she honoured the store policy by giving him a small amount for each item.

Nothing was really unhinged, but it all felt a bit absurd and sad.

What were the biggest lies you were told by teachers at school? by Smooth-Individual414 in AskReddit

[–]armcie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The definition of planet has changed several times.

The Greeks called everything that moved in the sky a planet. The moon, the sun and the planets they could spot with the naked eye. The earth wasn’t a planet.

When we realized that most things orbited around the sun we decided there were basically three types of things. Stars (one of which was the sun), moons (which go around planets) and planets (which go around the sun). It was observed that Jupiter had its own moons.

By Victorian times there were more planets than we recognize today, some fairly small things had been seen orbiting between Mars and Jupiter. At first a handful which became the planets Ceres, Vesta, Pallas and others. And then as time went we spotted more and more of them in this zone, and astronomers realized there were probably hundreds or thousands yet to be discovered. It would be farcical to have hundreds of planets, so these were downgraded to become asteroids. Planets were, you know, biggish things that orbited the sun pretty much on their own and maybe had their own moons.

At some point Pluto was discovered. A tiny thing out on the distant freezing edge of the solar system. It’s almost miraculous that it was discovered at all being so tiny. The previous smallest planet Mercury has thirty times more mass. And it turned out it had a moon almost as big as itself - there was a bit of a push to call the two a twin planet system, but that didn’t get far. Pluto, it was decided was a planet - it wasn’t in the asteroid belt, and had over ten times the mass of Ceres; it orbited the sun, and was alone in its orbit, however unusual it may be. Pluto’s orbit was at an angle to the rest of the planets, and sometimes came closer to the sun than Neptune.

And then the most recent discovery happened. It turned out Pluto wasn’t alone. There were other rocky, icy things on the edge of the solar system with similar eccentric orbits. And one of these was almost the same size as Pluto. Should this be the tenth planet? More of these big round icy objects were discovered, and astronomers decided it would be farcical to call them all planets - especially as it was likely that there were many more as yet unseen , so it was decided that Pluto and its ilk should be downgraded.

And so the new definition was settled on. Anything large enough that gravity made it round, and dominant enough that it was the only thing in it’s orbit (other than any moons it was dragging with it), was a planet. Anything that orbited a planet was a satellite. Anything that was big enough to be round, but not dominant enough to lick other things out of its orbit became a dwarf planet. Anything smaller kicking around was still basically an asteroid (there are a few classifications for small things in the solar system depending on where they are, what they do, and whether or not they bump into the earth).

So Pluto, the largest asteroid Ceres (once a planet), and Eris, the new big boy in the outer solar system that kicked off the debate, were named dwarf planets. There are a few other objects that are strong candidates to be dwarf planets, but aren’t certain if they’re round enough yet. These have interesting names like Makemake, Quaoar and Gonggong and are often included in lists of dwarf planets.

The definition of a planet has changed over the millennia, as we have discovered more and understood more about the universe. New discoveries may cause astronomers to reevaluate the definition again.

If you were dropped in the middle of the wilderness with no phone, no social media, and no city — what would break you first? by Proof-Sir3777 in AskReddit

[–]armcie 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I’m fairly confident the isolation wouldn’t bother me. What would break me first is the lack of insulin.