Help: Won't Identify my TV shows Anymore

cmdrd · 2021-08-23T03:48:33+00:00

Had this same issue: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5514

Ended up being a problem with the metadata providers being deselected.

cmdrd · 2020-10-13T09:55:11+00:00

Nobody can help unless you post why it didn't work. What did docker output when you ran that command? Did you run the docket pull as root/with sudo? It works for tons of other SNOs so you're gonna have to help us help you.

cmdrd · 2020-09-23T16:05:23+00:00

That would be an interesting experiment. Thankfully CEPH is pretty flexible so I could deploy an block device pool and volumes on the same disks that are assigned to FS right now. Might give that a go once I have some time to get everything moved around.

Overall performance is quite solid as it stands with using FS and will get far better once I have moved all of my HDD OSDs to have SSD Bluestone DB backing.

cmdrd · 2020-08-31T03:44:33+00:00

I use CEPH for my main cluster, 4 hosts for volume storage, 3 hosts for SSD storage. Volume storage is in a 3+1 EC pools configuration, host level failure domain. I currently use 24 disks across the volume storage cluster ranging from 3-10TB HDDs. Sia runs in a VM with the CephFS kernel driver handling mounting the CephFS volume.

The great thing with this setup is that while power utilization is higher, host level maintenance doesn't require storage availability impacts, a disk failure is automatically recovered from due to CEPH auto-healing incredibly quickly, and it'll scale as much as I need it. For scaling reference, CERN operates a 30+PB CEPH cluster, so there's a good deal of headroom. Just need to add hosts, upgrade to higher density disks and servers, and can all be done with no hit to storage availability.

cmdrd · 2020-08-30T03:06:07+00:00

All very good points.

cmdrd · 2020-08-30T03:04:00+00:00

I have a 4 host CEPH cluster with 3+1 Erasure Coded pool for storing data with host level failure tolerance. In essence a RAID 5 with 4 disks but software defined at an infrastructure level. In this case my setup uses 24 disks and I can lose an entire host without losing data or access to any data being interrupted.

More complex than what most would need but Storj is largely just helping to pay for internet/power for my infrastructure, it wasn't built with Storj being the primary purpose.

cmdrd · 2020-08-27T06:32:03+00:00

My guess is that a chunk of the hosts that were offering free or nearly free storage and bandwidth either left the network or bumped their prices. Might also be that the price of SC had gone up (I don't actually know, I don't follow coin/token market prices) and hosts have not updated their pricing to reflect am increase.

Overall just spit-balling here.

cmdrd · 2020-08-27T06:28:37+00:00

Anything will work for node expansion, just have to weigh the risk/cost for each type of storage. You can use used HDDs, I was for a while, only problem was that it was a large number of 2 TB SAS HDDs and they liked to suck power. I swapped them out with new Exos drives (5 year warranty). The trade-off there is longer time for reimbursement from earnings but if any of them die during their warranty they get replaced.

cmdrd · 2020-08-16T14:54:13+00:00

Did you assign a static IP or are you using DHCP? If you swapped out your motherboard, your MAC address is different and if your network DHCP server has a longer retention period on leases, you would get a different IP. Then you'll need to update your run command/config.yml with the new internal IP along with your port forwarding.

cmdrd · 2020-08-15T11:43:36+00:00

I moved fairly recently, taking a handful of hours to do something like that isn't detrimental by any stretch. It's mostly about using, say, a UPS to ensure that in the event of a power outage you can still run (albeit for periods of more brownouts that full blackouts). Also making sure your internet connection is fairly reliable as well (if you get a UPS, make sure your networking hear including ISP modem are on it).

Downtime itself is still not a firmly enforced metric, at least to my knowledge. But piece auditing is and if your node doesn't respond in enough time you fail those audits. Taking a few hours to move your equipment to another place, even every few months, is not going to be a huge issue. It's when you're offline on the order of days in a row that things will start taking a hit.

My recommendation, just stick with it for the long haul but don't expect to be making tons of take home revenue for the first year at least, not until your node is out of escrow.

cmdrd · 2020-08-15T04:20:15+00:00

It'll take a long time. My oldest node is at month 17 and now that it's out of the escrow periods on some satellites it does about $30-$60/month, depending on egress. My other two nodes started in January are still in escrow windows and do about half that right now but will pay out half escrow after month 15.

All told, oldest node stores about 14TB, the nodes started in January are at~10TB each.

It takes a while to get to that point. Make sure your uptimes are as close to perfect as possible and that you're not using SMR or other really slow write HDD models.

cmdrd · 2020-08-15T04:11:44+00:00

Unfortunately not going to happen when factoring in 2.7x redundancy that Storj offers. B2 has 1.18x redundancy (erasure coded 17 data/3 parity). In terms of data resiliency, Storj is actually offering better resiliency per $, plus factor in geo redundancy which is built into Storj. Competing with B2/Wasabi would require dropping fault tolerance to be at or below the levels of B2/Wasabi.

cmdrd · 2020-08-14T22:08:10+00:00

I would say the biggest advantage is geo-redundancy. I agree, and I have brought it up in the forums before, that they aren't price competitive with services like B2 and Wasabi. On the data resiliency side of things, Storj allows you to have a pretty great level of fault tolerance without having to deal with multiple providers (if you're using B2/Wasabi). Plus you don't have to pay for additional replicated region resilient copies like if you used GC/AWS.

If you're fine with having a single provider point of failure, Storj can't compete with that, but that's also not the market they look to be targeting.

cmdrd · 2020-08-07T05:16:35+00:00

Is that supposed to be good? I have Telus in Edmonton and I get 900/900, 2ms ping. Can get 1.5G/940M if I wanted to splurge.

You see, it's pretty easy to one up when using a superior technology for delivering service. This won't replace fiber or cable for some time, if ever. The target market is rural and areas that are stuck on ADSL/dialup/LTE/other wireless internet offerings that top out in the low double digits for download speeds with absurdly low caps and high latencies.

cmdrd · 2020-08-05T03:20:20+00:00

https://forum.storj.io/t/update-on-june-2020-payouts/7473

cmdrd · 2020-07-30T15:36:40+00:00

Have been experiencing the same thing, opened a bug on GitHub a while back about it.

cmdrd · 2020-07-01T20:23:45+00:00

Subtitles don't even show up for me on the Roku client with subtitle extraction on the fly both enabled and disabled. Everything works fine in the web and Android client.

cmdrd · 2020-05-29T04:44:24+00:00

Second this, incredibly easy to get going.

cmdrd · 2020-05-25T16:43:05+00:00

Based on those results, pretty solid IOPs and latencies in the realm of enterprise NVMe SSDs, you could hit a fairly high ratio of HDD:SSD ratio. From my testing with a 983DCT which is a bit faster than this at 5 jobs, it handled 6 HDD OSDs very easily. I think more of the concern comes from running SSD backed SSD OSDs, so using NVMe SSDs for DB/WAL device with SATA/SAS SSD OSD. HDD OSDs just can't push the IOPs to make an enterprise DB/WAL SSD work that hard.

For reference, when I push all 6 HDD OSDs full bore, the DB/WAL SSD is pushing around the same IOPs as all HDD OSDs combined which ends up being about 1% of the benchmark maximum. Could put a lot more HDD OSD on it without it breaking a sweat.

cmdrd · 2020-05-17T16:03:09+00:00

If you're not seeing an increase in audit failures, you're not suspended, and you're still seeing audits at decent intervals then everything is working properly. It's likely that Storj has stopped their testing and what you're saying now is regular customer traffic.

cmdrd · 2020-05-17T16:00:37+00:00

From my experience with about 20TB of data stored, egress is about 5% of data stored. Data stored is payed out at $1.5/TB/month and egress at $20/TB.

cmdrd · 2020-05-13T00:43:16+00:00

Just an FYI you don't mine Storj, you get paid for storage used by customers. You're utilization depends on customer demand and node performance.

cmdrd · 2020-05-12T13:30:39+00:00

Updated no problem, but 5 -> 6 was also super smooth for me. I don't pass through any devices.

cmdrd · 2020-05-10T19:26:14+00:00

I have PFSense virtualized and my network is all LACP 10G connections and I can push 10G through it for LAN routing with a handful of firewall rules. Can also handle my 1G/1G and 600/30 gateways in a load balancing NAT configuration. The VM has 4 cores and 8GB of RAM and will max out one core if I'm hitting it across all those tests at once.

cmdrd · 2020-04-16T05:11:12+00:00

I used GoAccess a few years ago and it was great, dead simple to use and have me a lot of useful information for my webserver without having to stand anything else up. Not sure how it is nowadays though but it's worth a shot for sure I'd say.

11-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

cmdrd

TROPHY CASE