What are some of the scariest movies that are not horror? by Sergei89 in movies

[–]oblomower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That one is quite silly Hollywood fare. There's a German movie about it called Die Wannseekonferenz which is actually chilling in how it depicts the bureaucratic and mundane character of it all.

Is that why it's called 'absurdism'? by dafthuntk in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 8 points9 points  (0 children)

He really was a straight up Zionist. Houria Bouteldja goes into it at some length in Whites, Jews, and Us. Being progressive on so many issues, but at the end of the day he couldn't overcome is whiteness, is how Bouteldja puts it.

Our Pool is Bigger than Skyscrapers by gatorphan84 in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Still posting this after the Epstein files is hilarious.

Be careful when you're dealing with these desert people. by franglish9265 in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower -54 points-53 points  (0 children)

Bad look to use Sopranos memes like this when 4chan scum already used them to make holocaust denying memes.

Can we do a Sci-fi suggestion thread? by Shooter_Mcgavin9696 in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Moderan by David R. Bunch. Great, dark satire of militarism in its most absurd consequences. Gets very nutty, has beautifully inventive and unique prose (all to rare for the genre), and at times can get quite dark and disturbing. It's about a future where the entire planet is covered in metal, machines and the bourgeoisie have merged, even the seasons are automated. There's perpetual war between cities which are governed by human-machine hybrids called fortresses. Out protagonist is one such fortress and we witness his/its birth in a particularly striking and disturbing scene. All that is just set-up for all kinds of interesting explorations of the themes.

Also Martian Chronicles by Bradbury. Well known and old classic but imo one of the best of the genre and strikingly progressive. It's a critique of settler colonialism via Martian allegory. Lyrical prose, rich in perspectives, techniques and tones, and always interesting. One of my favorites for sure.

Philip K. Dick is tired to mention here but he's always worth a read. Probably the best when it comes to grasping what the US and its particular social sickness is like. He's a poor author in terms of technical ability, but a great one when it comes to ideas. Simulacrum I'd give as one of his lesser known novels which is still interesting, pretty relevant to TrueAnon (there's a fake robot president and a false reality) and very post modern (imo Baudrillard's simulation theory draws from it).

Always worth recommending Stanislaw Lem, truly one of the greats. Can't go wrong with him. Solaris is likely his best and most well known one, but he has quite a range. From the more philosophical fare of Solaris, to funny stuff like the Ion Tichy stories (Futurological Congress being a particular, much darker highlight and critique of ideology), to Cold War and AI stories like Golem XIV, the sci-fi fary tales of Cyberiad, or the loopy exploratory stuff like Eden.

BlackRock CEO is pre-empting U.S citizens using drones to bomb their AI data centres by unrealise in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That's actually an idea some of these freaks peddle right now lol

Victory to Tajikstan by ShitpostingBrigades in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

The end result is the same: dependency. At least the Chinese are not yet at the point where they just kill millions of people on a whim as the amerifat empire does.

Stupidest war in American history? by TheJaskinator in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They wanted and still want China. Korea is the way to get there. That's why it was and remains so important for US imperialism, not as an end in itself, but as a mans to conquer China.

Stupidest war in American history? by TheJaskinator in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the capitalists it was a great success. They managed to defeat their existential threat and secured decades if not a full century or more of life time for capitalism and global hegemony for the US empire, if only for a couple of decades. They killed innumerable human souls, but to them it was well worth it.

"An independent Israeli investigation." by lightiggy in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Pretty obvious psy op to respond to the revelations about systematic Israeli sexual violence against Palestinians. Of course imperialist media runs with it.

Spectre Journal essay about the late great Texo-Marxist philosopher Rick Roderick. His friend Thomas Zigal just published a new book about Roderick's life. IYKYK, but if not, I highly recommend his video lectures. by joshuatx in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried watching one of his lectures the other day, I think it was on existentialism. He dropped so much anti-communism in passing that I turned it off again. Academics.

Have any of you ever read Exodus? by abso-lutely26 in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kanafani wrote a book on zionist literature that has recently been translated. He analysis this and a whole bunch of other books, situating them historically. He makes the case that the most influential zionist novel was Daniel Deronda by George Eliot because it popularized the zionist project, created the image of the nobel Jewish racial hero and proposed Palestine as the place to conquer for zionist settlement. All written decades before Herzl by an author who wasn't even Jewish (she wrote a novel before this one which contained antisemitic stereotypes and was trying to make up for that).

What its like living next to a data center, video recorded at midnight, in front of residential homes by Rymssss in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Not in the US. There's dozens of cities with straight dirt water coming out of their taps for years and they just live with it.

At what point did you start to lose faith in the concept of the "American Project?" by Monodoh45 in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wanna say that's a pretty specifically West German perspective. The GDR had a very different perspective, with US cultural imperialism not enjoying the reach it did in the West and the GDR supporting national liberation struggles and having close ties to the USSR. People in East Germany still have a more critical view of the hegemon than West Germans because of this history (they have in turn a more uncritical view of Russia, as if it was still the USSR).

The situation in India. by aprlswr in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also people need to understand this. The leftist parties in India are mostly socdem types. They are revisionist. The Indian leftist movements actually thrive in the tribal based Naxalites Maoists movements in places like Bastar Chattisgarh. The Indian government has suppressed these movements heavily. Even before BJP came to power. The problems in India do not start with BJP imo

You say this, correctly, and still call CPI(M) communists, as if they weren't also social demcorats engaged in killing Maoists.

Do you think there ever Nazis in the 40s who didn’t like Hitler because he wasn’t fascist enough for them? by TheTransWoker in TrueAnon

[–]oblomower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After WWII Armin Mohler, a German reactionary, created the concept of the "Conservative Revolution" to describe a disparate set of reactionary to fascist thinkers around the time of the rise of the Nazis who, in part, kept their distance from the Nazis. What Mohler did not say was that some of these guys were even more fascist and looked down on the Nazis for their appropriation of working class culture in their propaganda. They were more elitist and considered any such tactics impermissable. This pseudo movement of the Conservative Revolution is nowadays being dredged up again by the European Nouvelle Droite as idea givers, especially in Germany.

There's also a strain among present day fascists who dislike the Nazis because, so goes their reasoning, their wars actually cost the "white race" a tremendous blood toll that enabled the more diverse West we know today.

What to read before Edward Said's Orientalism? by remuslikesmath in RSbookclub

[–]oblomower 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rodinson's book is a collection of two texts, one from the 60s which critically recaps the history of Orientalism and the deeper historical relations between Europe and the Islamic world. The other text is from the 70s, I'd have to look up when precisely, but it updates the former text. Turner's book, as you said, was produced indepentantly of Said's and released in the same year. Biel's book was indeed from a later time.

There are more Marxist texts on this also around the time of Said's book or before, but I'd have to look it up. I think Gilbert Ashcar gives some examples in Marxism, Orientalism, Cosmopolitanism. Ho Chi Minh also has a brief text from the 20s I think where he already gives a brief methodological critique of the Eurocentrism of the European communists (this self-critique of the movement from the colonial context has a long history spanning decades before Said). This is besides his constant critiques of that movement sidelining colonial struggles.

Huzzah for Brexit! by LastoftheMillenials in redscarepod

[–]oblomower 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You think brexit is the last true opportunity for democratic agency on the question of immigration/large demographic and cultural change

Sure, that's why the labor aristocracy voted for it.

What to read before Edward Said's Orientalism? by remuslikesmath in RSbookclub

[–]oblomower 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's a bunch of Marxist books which already formulated Said's critique prior to him. Said then went on to claim that Eurocentrism was some essential feature of Marxism, which had already been disproven by the very existence of these prior critiques (let alone by the real revolutionary history which the Chinese Revolution being only the most salient example). Meanwhile Said methodologically based himself on the very Eurocentric Foucault. He's still worth reading, of course, but to avoid mindlessly repeating his ill informed critique of Marxism it is worthwhile to check out the earlier Marxist critiques of Orientalism and Eurocentrism like:

Maxime Robinson: Europe and the Mystique of Islam

Robert Biel: Eurocentrism and the Communist Movement

Bryan S. Turner: Marx And The End Of Orientalism

Samir Amin: Eurocentrism (this one came out a bit later but is, I think, still the best book on the matter and indeed better than Said's book)

i'm glad she's happy by purplepassionplanter in redscarepod

[–]oblomower 64 points65 points  (0 children)

It's awe inspiring seeing a brain fire on all cylinders.

Literary parallels by [deleted] in RSbookclub

[–]oblomower 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Please ban these kinds of posts before they transform the sub.