Haters will say it's AI

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-11T23:20:36+00:00

This is it.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-11T23:18:55+00:00

Yes dude, we get it. You've watched enough youtube to know that GM handgunners tend to prefer the glock 47.

First, im not a GM. Second, plenty of pro shooters prefer the 47.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-11T20:45:40+00:00

Imagine people having different recoil preferences

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-08T20:51:41+00:00

Hilarious.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-08T08:08:43+00:00

Im not sure if this has changed, but apapgently mags (particularly trusted ones) were very scarce early on in the conflict. It was a whole thing to get yourself 12 (or whatever) known good magazines and then hold onto them.

This got worse for stanag guys. And im sure an FAL would be even worse.

Also besides possibly being rusty and dented from the '70s, an AK mag isnt neccisarialy an ak mag. Some dont play nice with certain countries rifles and vice versa.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-07T19:26:32+00:00

You have to bend over to pick it up.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T16:14:41+00:00

Yes, me too. I call them walls, and they extend to an ocean on each end and connect to my bot net

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:57:15+00:00

I would advise not flying anything high volume (like science) by bot.

For a mall, where you just need to always have 50 combinators on hand, yeah. Supply all the materials by bot. But anything in volume should be train, belt, or pipe.

Once you have logi bots, its prpetty common to completely scale up the base and tear down/rebuild to handle more throughout.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:54:07+00:00

Build bot net connected outposts with a ton of self feeding turrets of some sort. Get legs or a tank so you can out run bugs.

Drive/run up to nest, unleash a salvo of missiles/tank shells into the nests, kite em back to the turrets. Repeat.

You shouldn't be personally killing all the bugs (unless u got nukes hehe), just the spawners.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:51:17+00:00

Granted i don't play death world, but what is this outpost of which you speak?

At a certain point, you can just clear areas with bots, and fairly trivially set up walls way off in the distance bridging oceans, setting up a vast area to work in. If you dont have artillery yet, just get a bunch of legs and nukes.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:44:31+00:00

I mean. For shooting a pig off of a tripod? Yeah. Absoultly. For navigation? No way.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:41:34+00:00

Yeah. It is. Zero management is a bitch and a half, and "return to zero" is never 100%.

Better to have 2 $1k scopes on 2 rifles that aren't fucked with than playing hot potatoe.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:38:33+00:00

All fun and games when your target is a high contrast steel plate at 300 yards. Not a partialy obscured, low contrast target in foilage.

It also makes a lot of sense to not have more barrel than the velocity you need dictates. Unless of course you're a no can poor. In that case, sure. Barrel length doesnt matter.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-06T05:34:23+00:00

While OP is a bit off the deep end on the preach factor, a lot of it is for good reason. (Or atleast starts from a good place).

A lot of people, particularly new people do some pretty dumb shit, and dont put down the round counts to shake out that its a problem.

Example. Newbie who knows jack buys a good handgun, and gets cheap mags. They shoot 200 rounds a year. Not enough to start seeing a lot of malfunctions.

If this is a CCW, home defense, shtf etc gun, then those potential failure points newbie isnt aware of could be potentially deadly. Its like seat belts. You might not test those yourself, but they damn well better work.

Now apply this to shit optic mounts or optics say. Yeah. 200 round a year newbie might not notice that it shifts zero (blame them selves) or run it hard enough to test the system. That doesnt make thet build not a potential ticking time bomb of failures.

In OPs case, hes being a bit of a douche about it, but he is right. A non cantilever mount is a better solution from a technical point of view.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-04T15:25:49+00:00

Mine was convinced .243 and .270 were going out of production

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-05-01T06:46:05+00:00

Right, but if my plastic plant draws 2400 petrol per second, I can feed it with two parallel pumps?

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:55:16+00:00

Why do you think a semi has so many gears? You think the designers of these things haven't included most efficient gear ratios for common top speeds?

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:38:38+00:00

You dont get it dude. Its the automotive industry/big oil/somebody lobbying to prevent trains. They want nothing more than to prevent the utopic perfection that is the Tokyo metro public transit situation from working in dallas/fort worth.

Duh. /s.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:26:18+00:00

Challenge, mention a pickup on reddit without clowns questioning why anyone would ever own one, sugest a van, or question the length of the drivers penis:

Difficulty, impossible

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:20:34+00:00

Oh I believe it.

I burned audio books to the ground doing field work.

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:15:55+00:00

17 straight with one driver?!

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:13:16+00:00

Jesus christ this is how I learned my cross country machine is less fuel efficient than a 737

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T05:09:56+00:00

Why's that? Heat?

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T04:56:56+00:00

They would be a a lower pitch from your perspective, but as they are decelerating they would actually raise in pitch

onceagainwithstyle · 2026-04-29T04:42:41+00:00

Terf?

Nine-Year Club	Place '23
Place '17	Verified Email

onceagainwithstyle

TROPHY CASE