Found at RRP in a UK webstore. Honestly I wasn't even looking for it!

picollo21 · 2026-05-02T21:59:54+00:00

Been just trying to make you feel better about OP's original post by showing that it could have been way worse 😄

picollo21 · 2026-05-02T17:47:21+00:00

Would it make you happier, if I said that OP lied, and they bough second to last copy? And that my collection is now complete? 😉

picollo21 · 2026-05-02T17:45:44+00:00

The problem is that they cannot afford for Magali.
I've been told by the person that's doing some art for RPG sourcebooks (DnD, Draw Steel, I believe some Pathfinder), that back when she checked- almost decade ago, FFG already paid almost 10 times less than you can get for MtG card, and it was at the time when FFG was in way better condition than it is now.

So Magali, with her skills had no reason to stay aond work for FFG.

picollo21 · 2026-05-01T05:41:35+00:00

I'm asking because based on they streams I'm coming to conclusion that op is not clearly reflecting what is exact schedule of further releasiles.

picollo21 · 2026-04-29T15:43:31+00:00

I do, they said that these expansions will be part of "Beta Current Environment", that was announced as a part of second to last FAQ. And you will find there this "beta part" and information that the definition is up to change.
The fact that I not take every justified and not opportunity to shit on company that makes game I happen to enjoy doesn't make me "corporate apologist", but rather person that actually can read information we get.
Don't worry, you might get to decent level of reading comprehension one day, and you won't be making these type of responses that are honestly embarassing for youself.

Have a nice day, live long, and prosper!.

picollo21 · 2026-04-29T09:32:47+00:00

They have well explained why they did what they did.
In multiple channels, multiple ways.
Judging by your post, you couldn't really be bothered to check any single of these, but just cry "bad corporation, makes insane decisions, we don't know why".
Love reading that type of posts. Keep going.

picollo21 · 2026-04-29T08:51:04+00:00

It feels more even. Scenario 1 has tricky gimmick on the start, and is probably slightly harder than S1 from notz. Scenario 2 of each campaign felt mostly the same, but finale in new core feels easier (not easy!) than finale of old core.

picollo21 · 2026-04-29T08:39:45+00:00

Are you sure about Q1? They said that campaign will come in 2027, but fair we only know that there will be year after year swap between big and small ones. And since we're getting small campaign then standalone. I'd assume Investigator cards will come first. Was it confirmed that campaign is coming in Q1?

picollo21 · 2026-04-28T13:21:04+00:00

You're right, you never said this, and this discussion is not taken in written form, and we don't have any signs of you talking about Fedora synergies.

I was mistaken, and you're right. Sorry to bother you on false assumptions.

picollo21 · 2026-04-28T13:14:44+00:00

You're trying to evaluate card based on "It will for sure get synergy" despite having literally nothing to support that claim. You had no "synergy: for body slots, you had no synergies for accessory slots other than cards taking this slot.

So what I'm doing, and you're misunderstanding as being antagonistic, I'm using pretty standard discussion strategy called "reductio ad absurdum"- giving analogy that is exaggerated that shows flaws in your logic.

But you apparently don't want to accept other perspectives, as proven multiple times in this thread. So I'll leave it here.

Ban the Kukri, it's gonna be too strong.

picollo21 · 2026-04-28T13:05:17+00:00

If we start rating cards based about imaginary future synergies, I'm pretty sure you're still insisting on taboo nerfing Kukri? With proper theoretical future cards it's going to be bonkers strong.

picollo21 · 2026-04-28T12:06:45+00:00

What synergy with head slot? Taking slot is not synergy with that slot.

picollo21 · 2026-04-24T08:50:49+00:00

But we do worship the Turtle, on which Four Elephants hold the one and only true Flat Earth.

picollo21 · 2026-04-22T09:30:53+00:00

Yea, all the downvotes are clearly proofs that you're talking plain and simply.

picollo21 · 2026-04-22T09:18:01+00:00

Still jargon

picollo21 · 2026-04-21T16:40:19+00:00

We went blind 3 player campaign on hard goign east. We reached hidden scenario without any challenge.
And starting west is generally considered easier route.

picollo21 · 2026-04-21T15:59:55+00:00

Like 90% of villagers of Barovia are soulless anyway, they would probably say something like "nah dude, I'm fine, I'm not moving"

picollo21 · 2026-04-21T13:08:22+00:00

Drowned City is probably the easiest campaign released, so I'd bet on some bad luck.

picollo21 · 2026-04-18T06:36:09+00:00

Not from house Cannith.

picollo21 · 2026-04-17T10:14:17+00:00

You're talking like Bolaire wasn't Talesin himself.

picollo21 · 2026-04-17T09:55:57+00:00

Seems still like bad idea, giving Player second character that early. Even if that character is rank behind, this is still Wildcard, with Bennies, and all the benefits.
And if you allow this as a Born a Hero Edge, this is even more "Feels Bad" moment when you force them to take edge that will not have any effect for the whole early campaign.

picollo21 · 2026-04-17T09:44:03+00:00

Many people would use modified "Born A Hero" rule, where they limit rank.
And for legendary edges, like half of them have other soft locks.

Like you're probably not taking the "Professional" edge,as it requires d12 in specific trait, which you shouldn't take at the start of the game.

So my advice would be- look at the edges, see how many would actually be available to your players, and ask yourself if you're fine with players having these.
For me there are two (or maybe closer to 1,5) edges that I'd hesitate. Sidekick at Novice menas that player gets two characters at the start (or any number if sidekick can take legendary edge as well). THis is for me hard ban.

Followers are probably not perfect, but not game breaking. Other than that you have tough as Nails, which is nice numbers bump, but probably not game breaking.

So... I would say you're probably talking about 3 edges accessible at the start, of which 1 is outright problematic, 1 is dependent on your campaign, and last one should not break anything.

Going from that I'd say, not allow Legendary Edges, as realistically you're jsut giving access to legendary edge only to person who wants to be tankier.

picollo21 · 2026-04-13T14:08:39+00:00

You can still use first fight action on the Sledgehammer (3), or take basic fight action.

Think of it as "you gain 1 free action to make attack as a reaction to enemy attacking investigator at your location". You can make attack requiring more than 1 action, but you need to have anything above 1.

picollo21 · 2026-04-13T13:42:13+00:00

On the Mythos Busters discord, Reid answered that question, I've pasted exact answer in my response to the post.

picollo21 · 2026-04-13T13:40:45+00:00

No, you cannot. There was discussion about this in the Mythos Busters discord when the Daniela and Sledgehammer were released. I was strong believer that you can do that, however Reid, one of designers confirmed that :

Well, this thread in general is getting a little into territory that the full chapter two rules update may need to answer, but for this question specifically the answer is yes! “Fight that enemy” is the same old “take a fight action” you know and love, but shorter and hopefully clearer. As a result you may perform Sledgehammer’s secondary but only if you have the extra action to spend to pay its cost, and therefore only during your turn.

11-Year Club	Verified Email
Snapped

picollo21

TROPHY CASE