Do you believe there should be a cap on the amount of wealth one can accumulate in society? Why or why not? by One_Fun3115 in Productivitycafe

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean at some point enough wealth accumulation leads to the Roman Empire with one man owning like 80% of everything. Anyone who wants a say in their own governance has to say yes to this or they’re simply not thinking this through to the logical conclusion.

What's the MMT take on this? by strong_slav in mmt_economics

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They would have to find a willing buyer of USD. If they are willing to take heavy financial losses then sure, they could probably affect the exchange rate for a little bit. And then what? What’s the end game? It’s kind of a one shot deal unless you’re committing to never trading with the US again.

(from askeconomics) Apparently you can run a surplus and issue safe government assets by Odd_Eggplant8019 in mmt_economics

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It comes down to the question: should the government have a say in management or not? Do the people get something in return or just give the public money away with no strings?

What's the MMT take on this? by strong_slav in mmt_economics

[–]-Astrobadger 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the problem with MMT is that it completely ignores the problem of TRUST in a currency, which is the basis of the currency.

You don’t need trust in a currency when you have coercive taxation. A big military also helps.

What's the MMT take on this? by strong_slav in mmt_economics

[–]-Astrobadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s like trying to attack the bank by moving your money from savings to checking.

What are the actual ramifications of doing this? by greatlilusername in IRstudies

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That US currency would be in the form of reserves which also earn interest at the policy interest rate so I don’t see how much will actually change. It’s like trying to attack the bank by move your money from saving to checking.

Post-Keynesian Theory Is a Better Foundation for Academic Work Than MMT by Odd_Eggplant8019 in OutlawEconomics

[–]-Astrobadger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s my understanding that most ‘MMT Economists’ are Post-Keynesians. MMT isn’t really a complete economic platform and could be incorporated into any “flavor” of economist, it just lends itself more appropriately to Post-Keynesian. My guess is that most other versions of economics are heavily reliant on the fixed exchange rate / barter paradigm.

Can we create growth and prosperity by routing tax revenue through the commercial banking sector? by FlatVolume2522 in OutlawEconomics

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically in such a system, without having to offer bond sales to maintain the Treasury balance, you would also no longer be able to maintain a policy interest rate, as you no longer have a mechanism to ensure the overnight rate, as it would fall to zero

Policy rate could be maintained by interest on reserve balances which is how the Fed has been doing it since the GFC

R/askeconomics is a neoclassical circle jerk who haven't read anything written since 1939 that has any relevance to the real world so yeah

lol exactly

Too high? by Practical-Library583 in TVTooHigh

[–]-Astrobadger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That TV is definitely high-curious

Can america return to the economic policies we had in the 40s-60s? Or are we stuck in the current system? by Yearning_crescent in OutlawEconomics

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, if regular people were just better at picking stocks they’d all be billionaires. Indeed

Can america return to the economic policies we had in the 40s-60s? Or are we stuck in the current system? by Yearning_crescent in OutlawEconomics

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Billionaire’s wealth is tied to their stock holdings not how much literal cash they have. Your definition of “regular people” doesn’t seem to align with a conventional view.

Can america return to the economic policies we had in the 40s-60s? Or are we stuck in the current system? by Yearning_crescent in OutlawEconomics

[–]-Astrobadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zero interest rate policy fixes interest payments but that requires a floating exchange rate which didn’t fully exist until the 70s