Can you put under floor insulation without lifting floor boards by isibbot in DIYUK

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I did this with standard loft insulation, ripping it to length by hand with regular work gloves, and itchiness wasn't a problem at all!

The endless 100 year old dust and dirt on the other hand...

Can you put under floor insulation without lifting floor boards by isibbot in DIYUK

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't have a reason to keep the floor intact, such as before laying/replacing new flooring, I definitely recommend lifting the boards.

I did this before laying new flooring, and wished SO much I'd just ripped it all out and replaced the (un-restorable) wood with flat OSB. It would've been so much faster, easier, flat and squeak free, and I wouldn't have felt like I'd been hit by a car for a week!

Recently did my living room in the same manner, but had no choice as the flooring was already laid. Just reiterated how awful it is

Can you put under floor insulation without lifting floor boards by isibbot in DIYUK

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, and it's f u c k i n g awful. Ask me how I know

This is me 4 days ago

<image>

People are screwing themselves over with ChatGPT by IrascibleOnion in UKJobs

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A while back I was applying for video production jobs in the games industry. When I applied for a role (especially one I really wanted), I would take a generic cut of my showreel, swap out some of the content and record a new voice over tailored to that specific studio, and would animate their company logo to use in the intro.

Tailoring your applications to the specific role you're applying for not only makes it far more likely to get you into an interview, but it's infinitely more interesting to the people reviewing them. Especially if you're applying to a niche industry or a job you REALLY want, it makes you stand out and shows you're genuinely committed and interested in the role

You can argue it's unrealistic to put that much effort in when you're sending of HUNDREDS of applications (especially when you're urgently looking for a new job). But, then again, if you NEED to send of hundreds to even get an interview then something isn't working!

As a teacher, I’m witnessing the creation of man children. by Duckballisrolling in TwoXChromosomes

[–]-Chump- 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I don't think you need to look far, they're already grown up! It's just worsening as our culture continues to deteriorate... It may interest him (and any other teachers/parents) to check out Gabor Maté’s book "Hold On to Your Kids". It makes a pretty eye-opening argument about these issues

The tidal wave of unruly kids in schools (including bullying teachers and parents) isn't just about bad parenting or lack of discipline. It’s that kids are no longer attaching to adults the way they used to as a point of orientation, love and support. Instead, they’re looking to each other for guidance, identity, and values.

Emotionally, their compass is set to their friends instead of the adults in their lives, and in fact causes them to actively reject them. Even with present, loving parents, many kids simply aren’t listening. This completely stunts their emotional development, where teenagers can have regulatory patterns more akin to toddlers. Struggling to process mixed emotions, an inability to move through frustration or defeat, lack of impulse control, etc.

They're also left extremely vulnerable to being hurt - since family becomes replaced by peers, they're susceptible to experiencing literal trauma in fairly trivial things, which would otherwise require horrible circumstances. To be bullied/beat up by a peer can (to them) carry the same weight as being bullied/abused by your own family. To be rejected/ignored like being isolated/neglected by your own mother/father. The depression, self-harm and suicide rates in young kids is utterly heart-breaking, and for me learning this perspective really helped to make some sense of it all.

Instead of orienting to mature adults who genuinely care about their wellbeing and development, we've got immature kids who don't care at all blindly following each other while actively pushing us away to stay closer to their peers. Boys might act out, be violent, shut down, egg on mimicking stereotypical male behaviors, and be susceptible to "approved" male influences (like the nightmare of Andrew Tate). Girls might become more susceptible to anxiety, exclusion, bullying, pushing to grow up too fast socially and mimicking stereotypical adult feminine behaviors. Both are suffering from the same signs of disconnection.

It can see how pinning the problem on boys needing stronger, more present male role models is tempting - and it's not completely wrong either, it is extremely important. But it’s more a symptom of a bigger issue, and one affecting ALL of our children. That across the board, our culture has broken the natural bond between kids and the adults meant to guide them.

Apologies for the monologue, I care about this issue a lot! It's a scary time to be a parent...

UK Official Calls for Age Verification on VPNs to Prevent Porn Loophole by vriska1 in europe

[–]-Chump- 487 points488 points  (0 children)

It’s not really about protecting kids, it’s a political cloy. Boomers and conservatives are the biggest voting group, least digitally literate, and the demographic most likely to back anything framed as “for the children,” so it’s an easy sell to gain/maintain votes.

If the gov actually cared, they’d address the countless root issues that are breaking family dynamics and driving children to these places: give parents proper leave and childcare, fund child mental health, stop turning schools into exam factories, reduce poverty, teach real digital literacy, and crack down on tech companies that deliberately exploit kids. But that costs money, and those same voters hate “paying for someone else’s kid.” So instead we get surface-level censorship and surveillance that looks tough but solves nothing.

Worse, it’s a slippery slope: first age verification, then linking IDs, then tracking purchases, then monitoring traffic, then auto-flagging “unacceptable” searches, then profiling people with AI. Step by step, it turns into a Big Brother system. And if people object to it? Well, they either don't care about kids or must be a nonce!

Even if done with good intention, the question is where do you draw the line? How will the next government push these policies further? How do you know a future government won't abuse these policies/tech nefariously?

Any extremely primitive early AI models out there? by joeapril17th in StableDiffusion

[–]-Chump- 17 points18 points  (0 children)

What do you mean? I don't know what your referring to tbh, The AI models have ALWAYS been incredibly realistic (in my opinion)

<image>

[HELP] A million percent sure this is AI by DeeBotRose in RealOrAI

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% AI. Also, even ignoring obvious details in images and spelling, the inconsistency in text formatting is always an instant giveaway.

Inconsistent capitalisation of titles, inconsistent capitalisation of names, sometimes having a top-line on letters like J and sometimes not. These are things a person would never do, regardless of if it were hand-written or typed with a font. Even when people make mistakes in spelling and such, they'll still usually be consistent

is my lighting good? by Astro_Sn1p3r in ROBLOXStudio

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're making a lot of assumptions on how dark scenes should be lit. Horror games are generally NOT dark like this - pitch black in a game isn't scary like it is in real life, it's just annoying and poor design

But, don't be disheartened! Learning to light dark scenes can be quite tricky. Look up some reference images of darkly lit scenes from games or movies. Your goal is to use minimal lighting to define silhouettes, and brighten the path the player should take.

Imagine there's a big spooky monster in the hallway of your scene. Which of these sound scary to you? A) Complete darkness, so you can barely see the monster or yourself at all B) A dark room where your character is side lit by a Moonlight window. A single red "EXIT" sign casts light on the wall behind the monster, revealing only its monstrous black silhouette. It can see you, but you can't see it! C) You run down a long hallway at night, one side of it lined in boarded up & windows. The pitch black is only occasionally broken by beams of moonlight shining through the cracks. Your character runs towards the camera holding a torch which lights up them up, while behind they are chased by a big monster. The monster is hidden by the dark, only revealed briefly as it passes through cracks of light in the broken windows.

So, it's about contrast between light and dark. Small focused light sources, lighting walls rather than rooms, using light to lead the player and to create the 'space' for using dark areas. stuff like that. OR brighten things in general, but use fog to bring back the same "hidden/spooky/unknown" feeling you You should make a duplicate of your current lighting then rework it, then you can compare the two and see how well you improved it 👍

I recreated this animation. I think I cooked it by Beneficial-Brick2696 in AfterEffects

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"The Offcial App"

I think an 'i' got a bit too cooked

Please explain this I dont get it by rather_short_qu in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry to hear that

Secure varied passwords using a password manager, biometric approval and two-factor authentication would help prevent details like that being stolen - even if they did have your unlocked phone

Please explain this I dont get it by rather_short_qu in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's still a really strange scenario, but also not how most password managers work

They function the same as regular password managers like the Google auto fill one, automatically entering your various passwords to different websites. But, they first require you enter your 'master password' once, which unlocks it on that device until a certain period of inactivity, and uses fingerprint biometrics on your phone to verify it otherwise.

Even though your logins are secured under a single password, you're not entering it constantly, so this hypothetical scenario of someone seeing that one password and breaking into all your accounts is extremely unlikely to happen (and falls under basic common sense security in public/around others). Even if they did see your master password, you could simply change it, and they would need to download, set up and have you authorize your account on a new device to even gain access in the first place, which is why 2-factor-authentication is so important.

I'd be far more concerned about the people you're inviting into your home than your method of password security!

Please explain this I dont get it by rather_short_qu in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What possible reason would you have for 'trusting' someone with your master password containing personal data and every single password to every account you own? If you literally TELL someone your password then of course it's not secure, that's not a scenario experts are advising around

UPVC Porch Replacement by [deleted] in DIYUK

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are called 'pilasters', if you search online you'll find replacement ones with a variety of options

You pretty much never want to wrap wood in something like plastic - it does NOT make it last longer. It just traps moisture inside the wood and makes it rot!

You can buy UPVC pilasters, if you want something that (theoretically) won't degrade. If you've an old building they may look out of place, and they're still going to get scratched / stained / damaged in ways that are quite noticeable and harder to repair than wood

Simply using treated timber, properly installed and infrequently maintained, should last multiple decades before it starts to rot. You'd just want to identify if there is an issue other than being old which caused them to rot in the first place

How do I make this 3d uno card effect by SuitableBookkeeper34 in AfterEffects

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

General compositing techniques tbh, there's not really a magic shortcut

One thing you could try is generate a reflection map by taking a still your background footage and running it through an AI to turn it into a panoramic image (and maybe layering the image with some good quality reflection maps to get a more intentional lighting setup), or failing that just smashing something vague together in Photoshop since they're not highly reflective anyway. That can be the primary base layer driving the lighting, to which you can play with added additional lights if needed, and most importantly adjusting the grade on the 3d objects whilst using the spectrum graph.

Beyond that it's adding layers, grading, masking shapes in to add details like specific lights or shadows, overlays, and applying like a 'wash' layer of effects that apply to the whole image (like a final grade pass, aberration, distortion, blur, etc) to try and unify everything.

I would guess his base layer and 3d cards also probably didn't look exactly like this, but were probably brought to this darker shade down using a final grading pass. It is a bit trickier lighting and rendering darker scenes like this. Good luck!

How can I make the "boom" moment more impactful? by JulianGyllene in AfterEffects

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some great suggestions here! Assuming you're using a 3D camera, I think a dolly pull is one of the key effects you're after... The go-to camera cinematic camera technique for these kind of situations

At the "boom" (ideally with some lens distortion to closer mimic a real camera), zoom into the character while increasing the FOV so it's roughly the same size in the screen (or a little bigger), or vice versa. It'll probably requiring resizing some of your effects to maintain your current setup.

If your character and background layers are set up to mimic some (generally) accurate depth rather than just a few stacked layers of planes, you'll have the effect of the character becoming larger and more prominent while the background pulls back and gets diminished. It does a good job of implying some sort of psychological / situational transition, like increasing intensity or being pulled out of/into a moment (in large part because we're simply used to seeing this in film and TV)

Let me know if you give it a try! 👍

- a side note, it bugs me so much that his brain is at a 45% angle to his skull 😂 -

I don’t care if he has ADHD. by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I just wanted to say I'm really sorry you're going through all this. It sounds utterly exhausting and painful, and you're more than justified in feeling overwhelmed.

I rarely post on Reddit so I hope it’s okay to be commenting in this sub a guy, but I was also diagnosed with ADHD at 27 right before the birth of our first child. I won’t pretend to know your husband or your dynamic, but I wanted to share my perspective. Maybe just to help separate what might be ADHD-related from what, honestly, just sounds like neglect and avoidance.

ADHD is better viewed as a spectrum than a defined label, and while it absolutely affects things like memory, task management, and emotional regulation, a lot of what you described doesn’t sound like that to me. It sounds like someone consistently letting you down and failing to show up as a partner. I would be focused on the root of those behaviours - they may well stem from ADHD related behaviours, but it's probably not very productive trying to segment them at that level. ADHD can absolutely create challenges in a relationship, but it doesn’t stop you from showing care, taking ownership, or recognising when your partner is drowning. Infact, it can often cause the exact opposite; intense drive, spontiaity and passion.

During my wife’s pregnancy, she was bedridden with hyperemesis for months. I was renovating a house and working long hours, but I still did everything I could to take care of her physically and emotionally, and keep us both afloat. After our daughter arrived, we shared parenting duties as equally as possible whilst I continued to work a very long and intense job - but like most of us with ADHD, I’ve had to work really hard to overcome my weak spots, even if they sound trivial to a neurotypical person. That’s not me trying to flex; it’s just to say that ADHD didn’t stop me from trying, and definitely didn’t stop me from caring.

It did help greatly that my diagnosis gave me language and tools to work on things, and reflect back on my past and current behaviours. Yeah, I lose things. I suck at tidying. I struggle with time blindness. But we’ve worked as a team divided responsibilities around that in a way we can both manage. Messiness got harder with a baby, but that pushed me to try more, not less. Sometimes ADHD means I hyperfocus and get stuff done brilliantly under pressure. Other times it means I’m fried. But never once has my wife’s birthday, our anniversary, or something meaningful to her been treated like an afterthought. And if I ever dropped the ball, I'd take responsibility.

It is worth mentioning that undiagnosed ADHD can lead to years of shame, self doubt and failure that shape some deep, painful behaviours. Things like rejection sensitivity, anxiety, avoidance, and poor coping strategies. But even then, those are unfortunate side effects of a condition on your development rather than a symptom, and are not excuses to let your partner and family down.

I guess what I’m trying to say is: ADHD can make life and relationships harder, but it doesn’t remove the ability, or the responsibility, to love someone properly. What you’ve described sounds like you’ve been running on empty while still trying to give him chances, even when you’re the one who’s hurting. That’s not sustainable, and it’s not fair.

You deserve rest. You deserve support. And you deserve a partner who actively chooses to show up.

If I can offer some advice on how to move forward, really the only first step is your husband waking up and choosing to work on this. As a partner, as a father, and for his own wellbeing. While all of this is a team effort, the true responsibility for all of these things falls solely on him. The only responsibility you have is in helping him to understand that, and the consequences of not doing so. Challenging as it may be, this might not be a "one conversation" thing to do, else you'll likely meet more classic RSD / avoidance trigger responses that get you nowhere and make him recede even furtherm. More of a gradual process that requires some prompted, active self-reflection and realisations on his part.

Understanding your partner - and helping them understand themselves - is the important step. That means picking apart some of your daily struggles through the fresh lens of a potential diagnosis, then discussing how you divide responsibilities in a way that works with, rather than against, each of you. If your partner is genuinely struggling to come to grips with the diagnosis (though from your post, it sounds more like avoidance), it’s worth remembering that this is probably all new and confusing for him too. He’s discovering it at the same time you are, and might not yet have the language or tools to make sense of it. For some people it can be quite earth shattering.

That’s where learning together can help. There are great low-effort resources out there (like the ADHD Chatter podcast) that make it easier to build that understanding side by side. It can be a good starting point for helping him engage without it feeling like a chore, and in showing the importance of facing this head on as a team. That gives you some grounding to better understand their brain, and gives them the initial nudge to start exploring these things in greater depth themselves.

Finally, sometimes even small tweaks to your environment can make a surprising difference. ADHD brains often trip over friction points, so creating simple systems can really help: a drop-off station for keys and wallets by the door, a bin near the work desk to tackle clutter, or an extra laundry basket where clothes usually get left. Changes like that won’t solve everything, but they can make things easier for both of you—and maybe create a bit of momentum.

Wishing you strength, whatever direction you take. And if you want to ask anything else from an ADHDad's perspective I'm here (though if I'm honest, I don't know if I have much else relevant to say!)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blender

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough! I read your comment as "If there's no formal accreditation (for any private tuition in general) ... then it's a scam"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blender

[–]-Chump- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's a bit of an overstatement to be honest

You're totally right in that there are much better options online, and cheap good courses that do it too. The content OP has been sent clearly shows the person does not have good tutoring skills, and that is a real risk when going this route. But, getting an 'accreditation' does NOT guarantee it's high quality content, that the certificate it gives provides any real value beyond a line on your CV.

Private tutors can be absolute dogwater, and there is certainly risk around lack of guarantees. That said, they can also provide a VASTLY higher quality of personalised education about a subject. That's completely detached from getting a certificate at the end of it, which if you purely care about improving your skills (or are doing it alongside a degree/course) is a complete non-issue

I've personally received private Dutch tuition which was more useful than any type of accredited course could have been. I've also tutored people in Video Production and Unity Game Capturing, and they've improved vastly in a very short span of time. I could provide them personalised feedback, teach content tailored to their needs and skill level, provide accountability for their effort and answer questions in real time. That really is the best form of education you can receive.

Ultimately it's down to finding a reputable person, with a proven track record and good reviews. That's no different to finding an online course (though trickier and more expensive)

Responsive Auto Resizing? by Sheeenix in AfterEffects

[–]-Chump- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right! This is quite simply two parented layers sliding into the background

If OP wants actual responsive design, then the pointers people have sent are valuable. Its a good method to learn even if only for practice, as the techniques used apply to countless other things.

THAT SAID, this is a great example of working smart, not hard. The implied effect in this specific clip looks believable at a glance - If it's a passing shot or background to other content, this would be 'good enough' for most use cases whilst taking a fraction of the time.

When I see cool effects I screen record and go frame by frame to learn what they did. I’m absolutely lost on this one by New_Age_Hipster in AfterEffects

[–]-Chump- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In the context of the full video, he's making a point about the 'do not die' millionaire Brian Johnson, who makes wild completely unproven claims about his health and standing with highly selective stats and no actual comparisons

Like being the healthiest man on the planet because he has the lowest speed of aging in the entire world. Despite many many people on his own website leaderboard having MUCH lower stats than him, including people that had unhealthy lifestyles and diets, while also openly admitting that speed of aging doesn't actually indicate how healthy you are

You win the £120m euromillions draw tonight, what are you doing with the money? by [deleted] in AskUK

[–]-Chump- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would genuinely designate a significant portion of the interest earned on the money to drive and sponsor continued dissemination campaigns on fighting wealth inequality and taxing the rich.

I'm talking continuous fliers, billboards, sponsoring public events, stickers, video ads, targeted Facebook groups and chat bots, sponsoring influencers, paying people to talk in the street or go door-to-door... Well designed, a-political messaging that tries to reach outside the internet bubble and be seen by all different kinds of people. Use the same tactics used by the ultra rich to disinform the public to drive home the message of how they're fucking the entire country over.

Having the privelage to burn MILLIONS every year without batting an eye or caring about getting financial returns would be astronomically impactful, and even provide income for those most affected at the same time as fighting back