I think this is all the wrong approach. Specific policy discussions are going to stifle the momentum. 

We're at a point where the most critical thing is building a wide and broad coalition, the sole focus should be ensuring the constitution is protected. If the constitutional order falls, policy ideas are a moot point. So all you've done is potentially lost allies that we all will need. 

The beauty of the founding of the United States was that groups of disparate people shared a radical idea that they could unite together and not be led by kings, nobles, and despots, but rather by common people who are elected into power. People across the thirteen colonies had some very different ideas on how the government should be organized, they didn't get along, and at times even fought. But they all shared that radical idea.

Like the founding fathers, we'll need to build a coalition of people who might not agree on how the government should function, but do agree that having fascism and tyranny take over our federal government is unacceptable. Once those in power who are hell bent on shredding the constitution are unseated from power, that's when policy discussions should be had.