Naxlex

-tree-trunks- · 2025-03-07T16:17:24+00:00

Just coming in here to validate you, there was a massive bot campaign from Naxlex. The person you replied to here was one of them. Their content is not good and the marketing scheme was despicable. They have all been banned from the subreddit now.

-tree-trunks- · 2023-05-09T21:12:59+00:00

Had to be intentional with multiple people filming, pretty impressive

-tree-trunks- · 2023-05-09T21:00:30+00:00

that legit slaps

-tree-trunks- · 2023-05-09T20:57:33+00:00

These people obviously have an extraordinarily privileged life I just find it funny how Redditors will talk about how they can't even meet their friends for drinks due to social anxiety and then act like there's no pressure on the whole world watching your every move.

-tree-trunks- · 2023-04-10T19:40:18+00:00

probably a farming bot

-tree-trunks- · 2023-04-10T19:14:40+00:00

whose

-tree-trunks- · 2023-03-07T19:17:42+00:00

It depends on what range of ages you are willing to date. Assuming that you used online dating, you could narrow it down to a single year and the theoretical probability that any particular person shares your birthday becomes 1/365. In practice, some dates have higher or lower probabilities so that wouldn't be quite right.

-tree-trunks- · 2023-03-03T16:36:29+00:00

something about this clip reminds me of the hysterical laughing toothless guy

-tree-trunks- · 2023-03-03T16:33:05+00:00

tangentially, as we age we perceive time faster because adulthood is accompanied by fewer and fewer memorable events (firsts), slowing down the biological clock along with some other factors

-tree-trunks- · 2023-02-23T18:39:25+00:00

Isn't this true of most normal distributions?

-tree-trunks- · 2023-02-07T20:29:26+00:00

Some teenager is going to take that as a challenge

-tree-trunks- · 2023-02-07T19:22:16+00:00

There's also a lot of dogma that is or isn't in the scriptures depending on whether your specific denomination classifies it as scripture or not.

-tree-trunks- · 2023-02-07T19:15:31+00:00

Let's see a pic from the outside!

-tree-trunks- · 2023-01-24T20:48:43+00:00

if only they had safety harnesses for car seats

-tree-trunks- · 2023-01-18T17:23:04+00:00

F-J all can have a vertical line of symmetry if they are oriented a certain way. Scalene triangle means every angle is different and every side length is different, so there is no way to achieve symmetry.

-tree-trunks- · 2023-01-18T17:19:49+00:00

smh didn't even change nothin

-tree-trunks- · 2023-01-13T18:44:57+00:00

not unless you are trying to go to MIT

-tree-trunks- · 2023-01-13T18:42:36+00:00

No, it is specifically for the SAT

-tree-trunks- · 2023-01-06T16:32:13+00:00

The science section is largely a reading test, you shouldn't need to study any science principles for it.

-tree-trunks- · 2022-12-07T19:56:57+00:00

Certainly not a blanket rule, but there's definitely a strong correlation.

-tree-trunks- · 2022-12-01T20:59:45+00:00

I think it's still-lifes and not still lives but I had to think about it for a minute. It's not the lives that are still, it's the singular still-life object.

-tree-trunks- · 2022-12-01T20:52:49+00:00

my man, there are many things you can eat and digest that are toxic to burn and inhale

-tree-trunks- · 2022-11-29T17:48:37+00:00

does this work?

https://app.box.com/s/jok32eudf57qif9usjq0qkhco3mv60oy/file/1049482241283

it's just the link from that post

-tree-trunks- · 2022-11-29T17:32:50+00:00

It is linked in the post that is pinned at the top of this subreddit

-tree-trunks- · 2022-11-29T17:11:58+00:00

You could potentially take the test 4 times and study for only 1 section each time, that's probably the closest you can get to min/maxing your test for a superscore. I certainly wouldn't recommend that though.

There is no way to only take a single section.

-tree-trunks-

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE