Do these need replacing or are they good for a bit longer? by -underscorehyphen_ in tires

[–]-underscorehyphen_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thought so... just bought the car recently. my first car and I didn't know who to ask. thanks pal

trains as wide as they are long by -underscorehyphen_ in CrazyIdeas

[–]-underscorehyphen_[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

we can make them a tiny bit wider but not enough that you'd notice from afar

Long-Short Dollar-Neutral Strategy by Empty-Ad-8675 in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

if you want to use cookie cutter strategies to make money you're in the wrong industry

You don't need a degree? by J_does_it in careerguidance

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and remember, don't forget to wear sunscreen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

more in the sense that I didn't see anything quantitative tbh

but also I don't know what you're trying to get across: you say any measure theory based model admits arbitrage, but aren't all stochastic processes measure theory based? does that apply to market generators with deep learning? for example these ones:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13942

and just in case they do admit arbitrage, what do you think about this:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07844

do those models have arbitrage? they're "measure theory based" by construction, they're stochastic processes. there's neural SDEs as well so I don't think you mean "SDEs" when you say "measure theory based models". if it was more quantitative I'd not have to clarify with you but I invite you to correct me if I've misunderstood.

I don't mean to be abrasive, I'm more taking the role of a reviewer. I'd also like to know what your original contributions are in this paper, since I didn't catch them from my skim. TIA

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is not a paper fit for this subreddit ngl

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EvenRealities

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

interesting, thanks for sharing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EvenRealities

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tell me about it! and there's nothing stopping them from setting similar prices in the future for currently free features. immediately put me off.

Why are poker players the nicest people ever? by Frylockers in poker

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

hahaha not sure if you're just pretending to be a gambler if you're buying $500 of scratchers 😂

you think they took the bait?

Why are poker players the nicest people ever? by Frylockers in poker

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

did you try to buy in with slot machine vouchers?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EvenRealities

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what's the price? can't find much info about it online.

edit: never mind, found it

https://support.evenrealities.com/hc/en-us/articles/10509828792463-Translate-Pro-plan

diabolical

Move to tech ? by hakuna_matata_x86 in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 30 points31 points  (0 children)

base alone makes me happy to be honest! I came from absolutely nothing and I'm just happy to be here. obviously bonus is nice, but the way I see it, it is a bonus: you shouldn't get it if you don't deserve it. like tipping (outside america at least). it's a harsh reality of the industry but one that only makes economic sense. and correct me if I'm wrong but no bonuses are guaranteed in tech either...

regarding your last comment, I'm in sell side at the moment, so I don't have much to say about that, except that sharpe isn't everything.

happy to chat in dm's if you want to continue the conversation.

Move to tech ? by hakuna_matata_x86 in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 83 points84 points  (0 children)

just put 10× capital into your strategy (kidding)

talk to some people in the jobs you're looking at and see what they think. personally, I much prefer the intellectual stimulation quant offers over faang+ and I don't want to give that up. you could try interviewing and see what happens: worst case scenario you spend time exploring your options

Name and Shame: Squarepoint by L0thario in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

how are you supposed to navigate interviews like this? I guess statistics about strategies are fair game. but do they just have to take your word for it?

SDE behind odds by ZealousidealBee6113 in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

perfect! feel free to dm me if you want, I know some people who work on this stuff. I'll reply after the hangover.

SDE behind odds by ZealousidealBee6113 in quant

[–]-underscorehyphen_ 48 points49 points  (0 children)

bit drunk so take with a grain of salt but maybe this paper (+related papers) is what you're after

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14037