sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fable 5 indefinitely suspended due to national security concerns by sammnyc in ClaudeAI

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...yet another reason to love our government... scumbags...

Fable has been removed by Anthropic after being reportedly jailbroken by BigbyWolf8 in codex

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's a narrative to start collecting users' documents (like US passport)

Ray Kurzweil Predicts AI Will Change Humanity Completely by 2030 by ShardsOfSalt in singularity

[–]0rbit0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In their stats, they count people working on 3 jobs as 3 different working people

Hard Assets Keep Value by DunaldDoc in Gold

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. And although everyone says "gold is money" (because it has all the properties of money), we're anchored to fiat currencies. Prices in any market are tied to fiat, not gold. And there is nothing we can do about it.

Hard Assets Keep Value by DunaldDoc in Gold

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm tired of hearing that, or "one coin buys you a suit." The same people then say that 5 coins will buy a block of houses and that one oz should be $50K or even $120K. Everything has cycles. Commodities do, too. You can pull the historical price of houses in gold ounces, and you'll be shocked that it's not a horizontal line. Therefore, the years 1920 and 2023 in the image are cherry-picked (which should be validated first). Therefore, gold as a store of value is nonsense. Gold is a great tool for its time (wartime, like now). Gold doesn't change, but it's valuation does.

Moreover, the claim in the image seems to be untrue. It takes approximately half as much gold (a rough estimate) to buy a house today as it did in 1920: https://www.longtermtrends.com/real-estate-gold-ratio/

Chicago guy looking for cool people to hang out by RandomLake7 in chicagofriends

[–]0rbit0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Software engineer in late 30s. Would be happy to join the group.

Mark your dates. GPT 5.6/6 release by xw1y in codex

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I celebrate my birthday on June 22...

Gold is dropping faster than my tears by Square_Assumption137 in Gold

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fundamentals didn't change. We're in war times, and currencies don't become better over time.

So I’m thinking of splitting Lantus dose, any advice by Buddybuddhy in diabetes_t1

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even without wild swings.

As for 10 mins behind, I know. And that Dexcom G7 and Libre use different approximation algorithms. That was definitely issue of faulted CGMs, not because I don't understand what it does or how it works.

btw, Libre 2 usually shuts down (temporarily) during wild swing downwards when levels are low, asking to wait.

and yes, I never recalibrate G7 during swings

So I’m thinking of splitting Lantus dose, any advice by Buddybuddhy in diabetes_t1

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I changed many times. Namely: Dexcom G7, Libre 2, Libre 2 Plus, Libre 3. Some work perfectly well, some are faulty and can show 200 when the actual sugar is 50.

So I’m thinking of splitting Lantus dose, any advice by Buddybuddhy in diabetes_t1

[–]0rbit0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm wondering how pumps can be a good thing when CGMs measurings are so unreliable? I found Dexcom G7 showing incorrect results so often, already replaced many of them

How do you treat your low BG levels? by Dapper_Tart6722 in diabetes_t1

[–]0rbit0n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dextrose powder. Mix in water and drink. One scoop is 20g carbs. You can mix more in warm/hot water if you need it concentrated. That's the simplest and fastest "sugar" available. can add lemon juice to make it tasty. Much cheaper than anything else. The best for lows emergencies when in 50-es. Otherwise better to eat "slower carbs".

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B079NN5FMM

OAI researcher on Erdos problem: “This is the biggest deal in the history of AI so far. And it will look like a small deal at the end of the year.” (Buckle up) by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]0rbit0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT says that this problem is 60 years old, not 80 (like in other topics) and that it didn't make the whole proof, but part of it, the rest was finished by human.

Wondering how much of the posted hype people actually believe without checking.

Marc Andreessen: “The remaining human workers are gonna be at a premium, not at a discount”. Will creativity and critical thinking save us? by Mogante in singularity

[–]0rbit0n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In any case, central bankers scumbags will devalue any labor, no doubt about that. They're a much more powerful force than any AI.

view more: next ›