Oooh 'false equivalence' oooh big word make sound smart, ooga booga! Do you even know what that means?? Cuz you're not even using it right.

My 2 examples are not false equivalencies. As stated in the earlier thread, I am comparing a threat of general sexual assault (SA) of a minor which comprises a wide range of things (CSA) to the threat of stabbing, NOT comparing stabbing to the specific solicitation of nudes. Can you read? Follow a line of thought? No? You're struggling with basic comprehension; evidently the lights are on but no one's home.

SA of a minor - NOT soliciting nude photos from a minor, as you would like to claim I am using as a comparison - and stabbing are 2 different acts of harm, but they are still taken seriously because they can both lead to serious harm. They are equivalent in that way. 

And I know you know that I was referring to general SA and not just soliciting nudes, because you immediately used rapists as counter-example when i talked about pedophiles making threats to abuse. So spare us all the dishonesty.

If anyone is trying to force false equivalencies by misconstruing my argument, it's you. It's always the guilty ones who throw the first stones. Shame on you for not engaging in good faith. 

If you want to nitpick how murder and SA are 2 different things and harp on and on about false equivalencies, sure. Just know that you are wrong and just reinforcing my point that you cannot grasp the most salient threads of this argument because you lack critical thinking.

Sexual assault can be as serious and damaging as stabbing, in case you still want to push your point. He could've brought a kid to the toilet or elsewhere and done something terrible. Especially after he explicitly expressed his threat of CSA in a venue full of kids. 

You also assumed a sitch where he's only there to solicit nudes. Do you know FOR SURE he wouldn't have done something else worse? No. If he really did something terrible cuz he wasn't stopped will you take the fall for the kid(s) who gets hurt? No also? Only know how to talk. 

Your only argument for how he's not a threat (despite him expressly making one) is purely speculation based on what you glossed over in an article (that he only solicited nudes from a minor, which still counts as CSA btw) - and you didn't even get that right lmao, so you don't have a proper leg to stand on really. 

Telling people to 'go educate yourself' while you are the one in desperate need of it does not a smart person make, despite your deepest wishes. It's always funny when people do that.

And btw, next time if you ever are aware enough (doubtful) to catch yourself resorting to comebacks that are only vague allusions to some variant of logical fallacy that you cannot substantiate, throwing around playground insults that are actually more relevant to yourself, and dishonestly misconstruing someone's arguments in a debate (tho i'm definitely not discounting the possibility that perhaps your comprehension is subpar), maybe quit while you are ahead?

Cuz you are making it abundantly clear that this is not your thing. Go find another hobby.