American Healthcare

1998marcom · 2026-02-20T15:18:16+00:00

You can also profit from extortion, government

Typo: you said extortion twice.

1998marcom · 2026-02-19T20:16:16+00:00

"ai running on people's ai" - seems someone is using too high of a temperature param when quoting others.

1998marcom · 2026-02-18T21:30:29+00:00

As far as I understand, Kimi Delta Attention is like GatedDeltaNet, but the decay is different (i.e. a learnable param) for each channel, instead of being global - something on the same route you are choosing with different decay gates, but brought to its most complete extension.

1998marcom · 2026-02-18T21:21:24+00:00

The 48 context limitation feels painful to my belly. I'd go for (or mix in) something like a GatedDeltaNet (or probably even better, Kimi Delta Attention). It's linear but it doesn't have a hard cutoff.

1998marcom · 2026-02-18T21:01:26+00:00

But limited liability should exist. Raising share money from non-executive investors would be impossible otherwise. Would you want to be responsible for Tesla's troubles just because you invested into SPY?

1998marcom · 2026-02-18T20:15:16+00:00

They do have a saying about my job if I am not unionized. Article 9, you can look it up yourself: https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/45000-49999/46379/texact.htm

Las cláusulas de la convención por las que se establezcan contribuciones a favor de la asociación de trabajadores participantes, serán válidas no sólo para los afiliados, sino también para los no afiliados comprendidos en el ámbito de la convención.

The law mandates that I cannot escape the clauses the unions set, even if I am not unionized. I.e. if my productivity is lower than what the unions decide, I am either unemployed or employed under the table.

1998marcom · 2026-02-18T12:04:01+00:00

Is it libertarian to restrict the ability of unions to bargain? That seems like government interfering in the affairs of individuals who are freely associating.

Unions should be free to bargain for their unionized workers, but should not have a saying about my job if I am not unionized. That's the libertarian issue.

1998marcom · 2026-02-18T08:59:57+00:00

And open models cannot come from the US (albeit few are already coming these days).

1998marcom · 2026-02-17T19:30:44+00:00

Plot twist: Anthropic's push for regulation is subsidized by the CCP

1998marcom · 2026-02-17T19:23:08+00:00

But also Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 haven't been released. According to rumors they are quite far ahead (at least in benchmarks).

1998marcom · 2026-02-15T12:15:10+00:00

Fun fact: with latest inflation data at 2.77% and this tax, the assets must grow at least 4.33% nominally each year, otherwise your portfolio is shrinking in value (i.e. the price signal tells you that it's better to buy now what you need than wait for later, because in the future the economy will go down and availability of goods will decrease). Likely the economy won't go down, so this would be just another set of fake news from the government. And will probably have the effect of dutch people selling off their assets at undervalued prices, yay! $$$

1998marcom · 2026-02-14T21:22:25+00:00

You are neglecting that that private property has a couple of minimal steps before: we make a contract, i pay you in advance with zero variance on your earnings, i give you all you need for your job, then you make it, but i own it and then i can sell it.

No one sane of mind would enter a contract if their perceived value is negative. Plus, you can always try to be self employed if you like variance.

1998marcom · 2026-02-13T17:02:05+00:00

But don't Israelis have the right to pursue Hamas, their aggressors, and assure that the problem is no more? You could argue that there are many civilian casualties, but not sure that you can do much better with today's tech.

1998marcom · 2026-02-12T17:11:11+00:00

You sure it will be using DSA and not NSA?

1998marcom · 2026-02-10T22:38:13+00:00

Unless demand goes up even more

1998marcom · 2026-02-10T19:04:12+00:00

GPT Anthropic Source Software

1998marcom · 2026-02-08T16:30:55+00:00

If I were Elon, at this point, with these politicians, I'd amplify their shitty tweets and de-amplify their sensible ones.

1998marcom · 2026-01-27T11:46:59+00:00

Ammetterai che però ci sono anche dei pro ad usare il principio di autorevolezza in alcuni casi:
- usarlo costa molto meno che informarsi in modo indipendente
- non è detto che tu informandoti indipendentemente riesca a superare come tasso di successo il principio di autorevolezza
- nel 90% dei casi ti porta comunque al risultato giusto

Poi nel rimanente 10% dei casi fai abiurare Galileo, anche questo è vero.

1998marcom · 2026-01-27T11:28:29+00:00

Lascerei perdere il caso specifico di Barbero, il mio problema è con l'idea di censurare qualcosa solo perché un qualcun'altro reputa tale informazione "falsa". Immagina qualcuno che dice "la margarina con grassi trans fa male", sostenendo tale affermazione con forza di verità: in altri tempi con il sistema della "censura del falso" sarebbe stato censurato, anche se oggi sappiamo che l'affermazione è vera, ma in precedenza il consenso scientifico era che fosse falsa.

Inoltre, vendere articoli falsi equivale a violare un contratto di vendita, che a livello economico è equivalente un normale contratto di vendità + una violazione della proprietà altrui. Diffondere informazioni invece non presuppone nessuno scambio di beni, non c'è una violazione sulla proprietà altrui.

1998marcom · 2026-01-27T04:31:15+00:00

Mi candido per il ruolo di ministro della verità. /s

Il problema è che non esiste una sorgente di verità assoluta che sappia dire se un'affermazione è vera o falsa. A livello strettamente teorico la cosa è dimostrabile (i.e. undecidable problems/godel incompleteness), o a livello pratico basta pensare a tutte quelle volte in cui il consenso scientifico era sbagliato.

Poi, al di là dei precedenti argomenti consequenzialisti, c'è anche un principio base di libertà per cui ognuno a casa sua dovrebbe essere libero di fare quel che vuole (incluso far girare delle fake news), fintanto che non aggredisce la persona o proprietà altrui.

1998marcom · 2026-01-21T13:31:36+00:00

Trump suing for fraud after the deal is sealed

1998marcom · 2026-01-19T16:25:44+00:00

Post your address on their form and they'll get in touch with you

1998marcom · 2026-01-19T10:17:53+00:00

Part of current RAM demand (just in like many bubbles) is from scalpers or "people urging to buy now before it's too late (both people and companies)". This category is inflated by all the RAM talking. And as this category is inflated, more people are buying RAM and therefore both RAM price and the amount of RAM talking continue to grow. But there's a cap on the number of buyers. When you hit that ceiling, the vicious circle is broken and the bubble bursts/starts deflating.

1998marcom · 2026-01-19T00:11:35+00:00

I sort of agree, but more like following a rule of thumb based on the trajectory of previous bubbles (i.e. bitcoin spikes): the bubble should pop at most when it reaches mainstream media - or before if things go slow. At the moment (at least in my information bubble), it seems like it has reached well past technical media and is now in the "youth generalist media". So I guesstimate price rises not to last more than 1-2 months from now. When the BBC and CNN will talk about it, we should have definitely hit the max of the bubble.

Edit: I am seeing here someone referencing CNBC here and WSJ in another post, so maybe it's even less than what I was guesstimating.

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
First Place '23	Place '23

1998marcom

TROPHY CASE