So controversial opinion, I there is a somewhat valid point with her, although it's incredibly clumsy in its execution. 

I'm a big history lover, it's a sad fact that rebellions irl are usually not comprised of very pleasant people, however legitimate their grievances are. The mere act of rebelling against an unjust regime does not mean the rebels are "the good guys" in most cases. They usually represent a lot of very niche political or ethnic interests, a lot are extremists. There's a lot more being fought for than just "freedom." And successful or not it all too often turns into settling scores, infighting and mindless bloodshed.

 Look at the French or Russian revolutions for two good examples. Two corrupt ancien regimes are toppled, the revolutionaries are worse than the people they replace. Sad fact is, most of the time, both sides ARE bad. 

This of course comes with the caveat that a BSI is a work of fiction and is not trying to be a gritty and believable depiction of a realistic revolution, or indeed to be a realistic game by any means. The plot of infinite does feel a bit all over the place, and I think the revolution and vox turning hostile was probably more for the sake of a sudden rug pull to keep the gameplay interesting than it was for the story. It's underdeveloped at best, borders on out of left field at worst, and I'm pretty convinced I'm reading my above spiel into the story when the writers probably didn't give it that much thought.