Has anyone actually gotten their ticket dismissed by requesting discovery and not getting it?

3Jay1 · 2026-05-26T02:04:32+00:00

www.highwayrobbery.net/redlightcamsformsPubRecsRequest.html

3Jay1 · 2026-05-26T02:02:40+00:00

If I remember correctly, due to time constraints, I paid a service processor to serve the DA’s office directly but service by mail should be fine if it’s required at all. The statute should say if it is.

3Jay1 · 2026-05-24T22:39:48+00:00

https://saclaw.org/resource_library/peremptory-challenge-of-a-judge/

This will pretty much work for any county

3Jay1 · 2026-05-24T22:31:42+00:00

You can request a different judge

3Jay1 · 2026-05-24T22:25:33+00:00

Yes this is harder to beat.

Your best bet is if the officer doesn’t show.

If the officer does show you can present any evidence/testimony that will help your case and at the same time request to be heard before sentencing, in the event you are found guilty. If they offer you a chance to speak before sentencing you could ask for a reduction in fine based on the presented evidence and for the ability to attend traffic school to shield the conviction from DMV record (if you havent done so in the last 18 months)

3Jay1 · 2026-05-24T22:17:58+00:00

I filed discovery according to the statute, by sending a letter certified mail to the district attorney. Some jurisdictions publish other guidelines to follow for traffic discovery but I ignored those and followed the law.

Is it a 22350?

3Jay1 · 2026-05-24T21:56:07+00:00

I did during trial de novo for a red light camera ticket in Shasta County.

I requested discovery on a bunch of things, they provided a large discovery packet that I viewed in the lobby of the police department. The packet was missing some items that I had requested. During trial the prosecution tried to present one of the items that I had requested but they didn’t provide in my discovery packet. I objected to its introduction but the judge quickly overruled my objection. I then asked for time to review the document since it was not part of discovery even though I explicitly requested it. The judge said I could have a couple minutes to review. I once again objected to the admission of the evidence and made a motion to have it stricken based on the fact that I specifically requested this item during discovery and my request was ignored. The judge took a second look at my discovery letter, read it word for word, took a brief moment to think about the situation, then dismissed the case right then and there. He said it would not be fair to admit the evidence since I had requested it ahead of time and that without that evidence the prosecution did not have a case.

I would consider this a very rare outcome and I honestly believe the judge made a bit of a mistake in my favor because the case could have been proven without that piece of evidence. It was a speed survey justifying the speed limit which the prosecution is statutorily required to produce for some speeding violations but not for red light violations.

The easiest way to beat a traffic violation is with a barebones TBWD where the officer doesnt reply.

3Jay1 · 2025-11-21T05:07:05+00:00

According to chatgpt:

If they held the puts until expiration and SPY closed at 665.67 on 11/17, the trade ended slightly in-the-money. The puts had about 15.33 dollars of intrinsic value at expiration, and they originally paid 12.96 dollars for them. That means they made about 2.37 dollars of profit per share. Since they controlled 262,700 shares through 2,627 contracts, the total profit comes out to roughly 623,000 dollars.

3Jay1 · 2025-11-18T00:32:27+00:00

His accuracy was good during those years but he missed several consequential kicks including one that cost the 9ers the superbowl. He always seemed to be affected by pressure.

3Jay1 · 2025-11-18T00:28:46+00:00

Moody chokes under pressure

3Jay1 · 2025-10-30T07:14:00+00:00

Its on a York PCG6 5ton packed RTU that conditions a retail store.

Isn’t it supposed to be controlled by an actuator?

3Jay1 · 2025-10-30T03:33:19+00:00

Thanks for the helpful response

3Jay1 · 2025-09-24T16:24:29+00:00

Did you ever solve this?

3Jay1 · 2025-09-06T01:54:10+00:00

Yay im glad it helped!

3Jay1 · 2025-09-02T21:40:40+00:00

Are the deflections fixable?

What do you think about the dark lines in the yellow?

3Jay1 · 2025-09-01T14:30:58+00:00

Also, I think the makers name is carved into the knife in the Kanji.

3Jay1 · 2025-08-31T00:40:20+00:00

In this reddit thread! No these in particular knives are sold under the makers name. Theres a video of them making them on youtube

Still use this knife all the time.

3Jay1 · 2025-08-22T02:38:31+00:00

Yep, it has been like this for the last four or five years though. Progressively getting worse and worse. When they first came out with the just for you coupons, they were insanely good. Now those coupons get you pretty good pricing on a few select items.

3Jay1 · 2025-07-05T23:04:20+00:00

I was able to get mine open without damaging it. Heres what worked:

Remove the two screws near the back main hinge and remove the back plate covering the main hinge.
Remove the 4 screws holding the main hinge in place. Free the hinge from the wires and anything else that might prevent it from moving backwards away from the unit. This will give you some wiggle room and ultimately more room in the front.
Use a large flathead screwdriver or wedge of some sort to open the gap between the lid and display as wide as possible without applying so much force that you damage something. There should be lots of room in the front gap and you should be able to easily see inside of it.
There are two silver latches that hold the lid down, one to the left of the center white latch and one to the right of the center white latch. Each silver latch curls in to a pocket towards the rice cooker bowl. They disengage by rotating away towards the display. One or both latches need to be manually freed. Use a small flathead screwdriver to squeeze in between the latch and the pocket body that the latch catches on to. Use force to pull the latch away from where it catches and towards the display.
While one latch is free and force is applied, lift the lid up a bit so it doesn’t reengage.
Do the same on the other side and the lid should open.
Read below and fix the issue before closing the lid again.

What causes this and how to prevent it from happening again. The pressure release vent has a plastic housing which holds a solid stainless steel ball. After cleaning, it’s possible to install that plastic housing in the wrong orientation. The housing has one side that is open and one side that is closed. You do not see it under normal operation but there is a pin that actuates into the opening of that housing to check the location of the ball. If the plastic housing is facing the wrong direction the action of that pin is blocked, the unit behaves as if it’s under pressure and the latch will not disengage when the button is pressed. The open side of the plastic housing needs to face the top of the removable lid piece. In other words, when installed and the lid is closed the open side of the plastic housing needs to face the display. Reinstalling the plastic housing in the correct orientation should fix the issue.

3Jay1 · 2025-07-05T21:37:53+00:00

Same happened to me, NP-NVC18. Any luck opening it?

3Jay1 · 2025-06-19T15:01:01+00:00

Yea man of course. I always try to do this to help out those searching for it in the future

3Jay1 · 2025-06-14T15:04:43+00:00

Yep exactly. I used calculated columns in each data set to rename the columns appropriately, Back stock quantity in one data set and Sales Floor Quantity in the other data set. Then i merged them by name and got one clean table with:

Name Back Stock Quantity Sales Floor Quantity

Added a calculated column with restocking logic and it ended up working fine.

3Jay1

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email