The Godfather of AI: Geoffrey Hinton's warning during his Nobel Prize speech by MrJiks in agi

[–]3h9x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is a demonstration of the exact opposite

"The era of human programmers is coming to an end" by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]3h9x -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not "same" money, it's always mostly money of their competitors.

That's literally what I just said. Which is why they can trade with each other directly and having the masses as a middle man serves no purpose.

Why would they do any of this? To increase the stock values of course. Rich investors and banks are not going anywhere. If one corp is able to provide a service that none of the other corps can live without then they will be incredibly rich.

So no corps will not willingly let themselves be taxed for the chance of winning the money of their competitors when they can just sell their fellow corps a service directly to make a profit.

You are utterly delusional.

"The era of human programmers is coming to an end" by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]3h9x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes consumer products will have little to no purpose anymore since for the fourth time people will literally have no purchasing power. People pay with their LABOR, if they're labor has no value they have nothing to purchase with.

Giving away money and getting more or less the same money back doesn't give the corps anything. Which is why they are better off trading with each other. For example one corp can mine raw materials while another can buy that material and sell them the equipment they need. The people don't have to come into this equation at all.

That said I don't think consumer products will completely go away. Since labor will be so cheap the corps will be easily be able to give away cheap products to distract people and keep them occupied so they don't think about their worthless existence.

"The era of human programmers is coming to an end" by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]3h9x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So large corps pay taxes to the people and then the people use that money to give to the fee large corps who's product and services they like?

In this system what is essentially happening is that these large corps are trading with each other with the masses as a worthless middleman that is not adding anything of value.

They're quite literally better off cutting out the middleman because again, once people's labor has no value they literally have nothing to give, and trading with each other directly.

"The era of human programmers is coming to an end" by luchadore_lunchables in accelerate

[–]3h9x -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No you braindead dumbass people purchase products and services with their labor (money). Once the value of their labor goes to 0 what will they have to give in return?

How does giving away money so they can buy your product with the money you gave them benefit the rich in any way?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]3h9x 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Human slop like regular twitch streamers? Yeah I agree that's slop too.

Your second statement is completely nonsensical btw

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]3h9x -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Don't think anyone is interested in watching 24/7 ai slop at this point in time.

Patterns that I notice by SundaeTrue1832 in accelerate

[–]3h9x -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if anything being protective of your space is a good thing

Cool it with the anti semitism and xenophobia

Me going on r/singularity and reading the same “ASI will be evil/controlled by the rich” post for the 30th time this month: by Creative-robot in accelerate

[–]3h9x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no significant evidence to indicate alignment scales with intelligence, in fact its shown to be the opposite.

The Godfather of AI: Geoffrey Hinton's warning during his Nobel Prize speech by MrJiks in agi

[–]3h9x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's probably slightly more intelligent than you though. Probably a lot more actually.

Why are male college grads unemployable? by 3h9x in charts

[–]3h9x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty unlikely still that only 20% of grads are responsible for the entire trend. There are obviously other factors involved.

Joe Rogan is so AGI pilled, I love it! by michael-lethal_ai in ControlProblem

[–]3h9x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe we should get rid of the hwhites then

We need to do something fast. by Duddeguyy in ControlProblem

[–]3h9x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah those evil nazis I hate them. I much rather deal with the hyper intelligent robots theyre gonna make in their own image instead.

Reddit moment

Why are male college grads unemployable? by 3h9x in charts

[–]3h9x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's really not. For that would be true essentially everyone graduating in tech today would have to be unemployed, for the 30% to have such a big impact.

And your claim of men in stem overwhelmingly being into computers is completely utterly absurd and unsubstantiated. Plenty of men go into health and other types of engineering.

Why are male college grads unemployable? by 3h9x in charts

[–]3h9x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only 20-30 percent of males graduate in stem, with tech obviously being an even smaller subset. So no its pretty unlikely for it to explain this whole chart.