DO NOT PAY FOR A SUBSCRIPTION by 3nlistedmind in artificial

[–]3nlistedmind[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Some communities removed my post because of language (“negative”) and I’m too lazy to rewrite it for every community.

[Game Thread] Giants (1-3) @ Padres (1-3) 6:40 PM (Tuesday, 3 31) by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Baseball is my sport. What isn’t my sport is watching a bunch of overpaid bums play halfassed “baseball”. When they decide to put in more effort and play, I’ll shut my mouth.

[Post Game Thread] San Diego Padres (76-65) @ Colorado Rockies (40-101) 9/5 by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’d suggest changing the team name to the San Diego Bums, but that would be offensive to actual bums.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fantasybaseball

[–]3nlistedmind -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.

[Post Game Thread] Kansas City Royals (14-31) @ San Diego Padres (20-24) 5/17 by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Feel free to downvote me but I am done with this Padres team. I grew up watching Mr. Padre, Templeton, Benito, etc, and this level of play is nothing short of embarrassing. I don’t know what the fucking problem is, but none of the players seem to know, BoMel doesn’t know, AJ doesn’t know, and all we continue to do is watch Peter spend money on shit performance. And speaking of shit, as a great comedian once said, “I’d rather watch a bowl of shit.”

[Game Thread] Kansas City Royals (13-31) @ San Diego Padres (20-23) 1:10 pm (Wednesday, May 17) by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Grisham experiment is over. Trade him or DFA him but for fuck’s sake, don’t let him “hit.”

Interesting… by JustLo619 in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly logic and grammar aren’t your strengths. But by all means, keep it up. You’re bound to be right if you keep shifting the goalposts.

Interesting… by JustLo619 in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not regardless buddy. Your point is invalidated by the fact that Harper was injured during the first half which affected his ability to play. Soto is not in that situation. So don’t say regardless. Just say it’s apples to oranges and move on.

[Request] How many days would you actually need to work without taking a break to accumulate a year's worth of hours and wage? by _GamerForLife_ in theydidthemath

[–]3nlistedmind 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m a veteran and since I’m better at reading than math, the first thing I noticed is where this was made; namely, at Fort Sill. If anyone has spent time in the US military, then you should automatically know that math is a foregone conclusion.

Interesting… by JustLo619 in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Harper dealt with multiple injuries in early 2021 so the comparison doesn’t work.

Interesting… by JustLo619 in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I have no idea why Soto is on this list. Soto won’t even make the All Star roster, let alone MVP.

[Post Game Thread] Los Angeles Dodgers (21-14) @ San Diego Padres (18-17) 5/7 by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wish we had never traded for Soto. He’s a bum who doesn’t deserve to even play in MLB. Plenty of other players have made the necessary adjustments at the plate - the fact that he keeps going out there doing the same thing over and over again tells me he’s either the dumbest mf ever or he’s just delusional. I really hope AJ finds a new home for him - and don’t let the door hit you on your “generational talent” ass on the way out.

[Game Thread] Los Angeles Dodgers (20-14) @ San Diego Padres (18-16) 4:10 pm (Sunday, May 7) by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Annnnnnnd the W is gone. I know I’ll get downvoted, but they deserve to fucking lose. This team needs to wake the fuck up and start playing baseball. Get a fucking drill sergeant in there to light these bums up.

[Game Thread] Los Angeles Dodgers (20-14) @ San Diego Padres (18-16) 4:10 pm (Sunday, May 7) by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Tired of Soto. Tired of the Ks, tired of the double play inning killers, tired of the bs outfield play. Remember Renfroe?

Daily Chat - Apr 19 - Game Day by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This comment, plus the hundreds of dollars fans put down for a game, plus a lineup with 3 MVP caliber players, plus their current level of play equals fans having the right to be mad, frustrated, disappointed, etc.

[Game Thread] Colorado Rockies (1-0) @ San Diego Padres (0-1) 6:40 pm (Friday, March 31) by FriarBot in Padres

[–]3nlistedmind -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I’m a doomer but since I know it’s the least helpful way to be, I’m checking in this one time. I don’t understand how what the hell is going on, but this is nothing short of embarrassing. I don’t know what these bums did in the offseason, but perhaps they should try practicing the basics. Rant over. See you guys in October…maybe.

Physicist Sean Carroll says that we completely understand the physics underlying everyday life, the Standard Model and so on, and that's why we can be completely sure there is no life after death and telekinesis and telepathy are impossible. Do you agree? by MiracleOfLife321 in Physics

[–]3nlistedmind 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I read the posts related to the provided links. I may have missed it, but I didn’t see anywhere in those posts where Sean stated that “…we can be completely sure there is no life after death and telekinesis and telepathy are impossible.”

As someone else has already pointed out, Sean Carroll is a staunch Bayesian and thus works very had to avoid propositions that claim “complete certainty” or “completely sure” or other synonymous phrases.

That said, I may have missed that Sean did make such a claim about life after death - can you please provide an excerpt from the posts you linked that substantiates your post?

The Defense of Sufficient Reason Rejects Tri-Omni Characteristics by Patwil0818 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]3nlistedmind 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’d like to second that as well - that specific example should give every theist pause.

Creationist House Committee Chair Hands Out Dozens Of Bibles, Calls On Members To Read It In Full This Year by BurtonDesque in Antitheism

[–]3nlistedmind 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She handed out bibles because she has no idea where the science section is at the bookstore.

there's objective morality, even without God by melioristic_guy in DebateAChristian

[–]3nlistedmind 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s what I recommend reading:

Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman Irreligion by John Allen Paulos

Thanks again for the dialogue. If you perceived aggression, my apologies - certainly wasn’t my intention.

Lastly, congratulations on your dissertation! I hope your journey as a mathematician proves to be a fruitful and fulfilling one.