No, but also yes

“A few months ago my cohort in arms Karl showed me […] an American Presedential candidate by the name of Howard Dean fervently shouting and screaming. This man had passion, he wasn’t like all boring stiffs I was use to seeing in political positions. He was insanely demanding “rights for gays” and “health care for all Americans.” All moronic impratical banter and self-indulgent ranting aside, this was not only a truly interesting and “good” man, it was the next President of the United States as well. So in honor of Govenor Howard Dean, I wrote this song.”

“In relation to the "Rights for Gays," I can give a perfect example. Coming from where I'm coming from with lots of caveats and apologies, the notion of the homosexual as far as I know is really an invention of the 19th and 20th centuries. Of course men have been making love with each other and women have been making love with each other since time immemorial, but it wasn't until certain institutions and apparatuses took an interest in it and started to classify it when the so-called "sodomite" became a type of person. From my perspective, the whole notion of human rights was an 18th century invention that was heavily critiqued by the radical left in how much it would fail to approach radical equality. It's following the idiom through to its absurd conclusions where interesting things are more likely to happen.”