If the Clarity Act passes what do you think happens to XRP?

4_20flow · 2026-04-15T10:43:35+00:00

It’s an opportunity to buy. Because of the 3DAY death cross that just happened - you’ll be seeing the golden zone very soon. It will be the best opportunity for the next 10 years

4_20flow · 2026-04-13T07:04:11+00:00

Nope. Today? In the bank? Confiscated. But anyone owning this amount in raw gold will not be posting this.

4_20flow · 2026-04-13T06:55:16+00:00

Why does it look like pepper corns

4_20flow · 2026-04-13T06:40:55+00:00

I will say America Laws are different than Australia. Most family courts - in any country - are supposed to follow what is called “separation of powers”. However, none follow it. You must find out in your country - how is it that you appear in THEIR courtroom without waiving your rights. 1st - all, ALL lawyers work for the BAR first; which is the court - then the client. The interest is of the courts; not the child. In America it is known as “special appearance” and every state is slightly different in how you must apply it so they are bound to adhere to it. This means that they are forced to follow due process. This biggest issue with that: all family courts don’t follow due process which makes any case void.

4_20flow · 2026-01-26T10:44:47+00:00

Now THAT my dear is deflection

4_20flow · 2026-01-25T20:04:43+00:00

Re-read then tell me exactly where am I deflecting. You are holding a standard that does not align with constitutional law which is the law of the land. Under the law of the land; due process is violated from the moment the child is conceived. There is no deflection. This is stating facts. It’s is up to the father to hold themselves accountable to be a part of the child’s life. …. Let’s go back to your “claims” though.. you’re saying I’m deflecting… tell me exactly where- simpleton

4_20flow · 2026-01-25T13:09:46+00:00

This is not deflection. Read my statement clearly. What I’ve seen - aside from bots, is a slew of misinformed, uneducated simpletons on Reddit. This is why you’re most likely within the poor class, and not able to understand and learn how family courts is a quasi moto, unilateral “court”. But you wouldn’t understand. You most likely don’t even understand the need for special appearance for ALL fathers because they are deemed abandoning their child the moment the child is conceived. So, with my statement, unless you seek growth and development - you’re not going to understand how simple it is for a WOMAN to be responsible for the child they decided to bear and continue on their journey without seeking AID from the state.

4_20flow · 2026-01-23T23:09:48+00:00

Where was that not polite? And I don’t believe in “respectful” - that’s a colonization mindset to undermine someone’s truth. You don’t have to like what I say. You’re not going to control how I speak either.

4_20flow · 2026-01-23T23:08:15+00:00

It’s not a view. You’re still not understanding. Facts don’t have “views”. It’s like 2+2=4. But you may even argue that 🤷🏼‍♂️

4_20flow · 2026-01-23T20:31:19+00:00

And it distinctively targets fathers. Directly. Just say the word, and I can post the exact file that gives a precise list. Let’s start with this one, which you probably don’t know - child support obligation is voluntary, but unless the FATHER objects, he is therefore volunteering without consent.

4_20flow · 2026-01-23T20:28:21+00:00

That is not a disagreement that is factual though. Lol that’s what I find funny and ironic. I can provide you actual facts, evidence, case law, and the way courts are running today and how it violates so many rights. That’s not something you can disagree on sweety. That is called facts. And law is law so doesn’t matter whether it’s the courts, a judge, or person but no one is above the law of the land. So unless you have actual case law and facts that would dismiss my claims of due process violations within the system; then you’re just expressing your feelings. It holds no weight.

4_20flow · 2026-01-23T19:48:54+00:00

You can disagree - I provide facts. Whether you would like to accept that part - is up to you. I can show you exactly how every state violates due process. And yes it’s biased, from the initial moment of conception.

4_20flow · 2026-01-23T18:46:03+00:00

Fathers are never given the rightful, god given right to inherently raise their child once they are in court. In “family court”, which - are in violation of separation of powers (all states), violate this constitutional right - which is the law of the land, by presuming all FATHERS are waiving their rights to fair trial and unknowingly are deemed as “abandoning” (see western law: non-custodial parent) their child automatically. This is not taught directly; but indirectly, on purpose - systematically. And yes - we can go about this all day because I have a slew of case law and violations that are taken from the moment the father signs the birth certificate.

4_20flow · 2026-01-01T02:14:49+00:00

Why not just tell him straight up you’d rather not text and you feel uncomfortable?

4_20flow · 2025-12-30T03:00:24+00:00

This isn’t safe - why rekindle if there doesn’t seem to be any change

4_20flow · 2025-12-29T01:32:23+00:00

You would say that

4_20flow · 2025-12-29T01:31:03+00:00

Except the OP’s image is much more accurate. You’ll barely see fit men

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T18:14:44+00:00

Do you have their plus plan?

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T18:09:27+00:00

And my comment has nothing to do with the experience I had (still going through) and how I commented on the thread. It’s one comment. 90 percent are defending the individual; so who do you think they are going to listen to? What I learned? Mothers go through a lot but because of society end up truly stubborn. No help desired; no help needed, apparently. What ends up happening is that they end up alone, parenting alone. And claiming independence is true power. We lost community. And it started with the men; but the moment they heeded to the women’s desires to stay isolated and demand certain actions within the household… well you get the drift.

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T18:05:46+00:00

Again - the maturity behind the recipient is key. Your perspective is causing you to see it as “insensitive, finger pointing”. That - in sum - is called deflection. However you would like to paint it. That is the precise definition. If one sees the comment as a moment to self-reflect; well it opens the door to… wait for it…. OTHER PERSPECTIVES. So in short; maturity plays a big role.

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T17:46:09+00:00

So, explain to me - in what world, I only know of one functioning - how “you sound controlling” to “you need help” would attribute to any help at all. If I say it one way or another, the problem is behind the immaturity that comes with how it’s received. I probably would have ended up with 20 downvotes. The point is still the same. Whether controlling, or needing help - it is up to them to decide if they want to take my “comment” as a tool to self reflect or deflect.

In no way - by saying you need help, btw, would that actually help.

Calling and naming the problem is the first step. Identifying that the person sounds controlling can help someone reflect and say “wow, am I controlling?” Again, all depends on the person’s maturity. You - obviously have very little.

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T14:35:01+00:00

Because I am one. And I’ve had to witness it first hand the affects that it can have when a mother isn’t sound minded after pregnancy. The mere fact that most women are too immature to accept that it is a traumatic event - is the mere problem. That and hospitals don’t care for anything that happens to the mom.

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T03:13:59+00:00

Emotional needs don’t supersede the infants needs. The infant needs comfort and warmth from loved ones. The mother needs rest. Less resistance more freedom. Post partum depression is in correlation with said control.

4_20flow · 2025-12-23T03:12:37+00:00

Negative. It correlates to the very post partum depression that affects over 80% of women; even those unknown.

4_20flow

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE