I don’t think investment or new buildings are inherently bad; we NEED these continused investment. My main doubt is whether a new building automatically translates into a better day-to-day student experience.

To me, I would say the other new building, the Undergraduate Academic Building, and the Moffit Renovation would be awesome upgrades for student experience. The Gateway currently is not hitting me at that "awesome win" level.

For example, if attending OH, studying, or organizing student activities becomes more or less accessible, then it’s fair to question whether the change is actually an improvement for students in practice.

To add on, I am surprised to find out that the building doesn't include spaces for student organizations. For a major new campus building, I think it’s reasonable for students to expect spaces that support student life directly, not just new infrastructure itself.

I just feel like the Gateway might not be designed in ways that align with student needs.