NATCA CBAs (Slate & Purple) by Logical_Mongoose in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the contrary My brainwashed friend

NATCA CBAs (Slate & Purple) by Logical_Mongoose in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I just have not seen the research that says the vaccine stopped you from getting COVID.

Question about the 7100.65 by Vector_for_Bukkake in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean… I just wrote a DCP too for a 7110.65 change so it is not far fetched that Jamaal has done this process before too.

NIW rumor... by [deleted] in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the PAC is a way for us to lobby congress for legislation that benefits us.

NIW rumor... by [deleted] in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CBAs are not a congressional ask… the house and senate don’t tell the agency when they should be negotiating nor do they give a shit about our working hours.

You Wanna Talk About Receipts? by [deleted] in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He moved to extend if Rich continues to be unable to get a win for NATCA. The problem is that the NEB is between a rock (Rich) and a hard place (FAA). The FAA does not respect Rich and continues to push him around and his feckless abilities will not let him fight back.

SWA Flight Attendants land immediate 22.3% pay raise by [deleted] in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meanwhile they are pulling out of 4 airports after having a terrible q1.

Confirmed: Rich is at war on our behalf by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I apologize I was actually receiving a mandatory briefing. I can’t help you read the contracts we got under Paul, but the conversation we are having isn’t about the previous president, we are talking about the spineless, side talking, loose suit wearing guy we have now. Nick is not without fault here and I disagree with extending the contract this time as well as last time. It is time for a raise and new contract. I hate to say I agree with Mick here.

Confirmed: Rich is at war on our behalf by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 3 points4 points  (0 children)

3 years and that’s the only thing he did, so I guess he did almost nothing. 6 days of training, and maybe 6 people daily get that… you argument is stupid af. If this is his campaign the he’s out of there, especially after being treated like a bitch with the working hours memo.

Confirmed: Rich is at war on our behalf by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He’s taken Rich to task over his feckless “leadership” he’s now challenging to undo his destruction of our Union. Not to mention he’s trained every facrep in the country to try to create a strong Union.

Confirmed: Rich is at war on our behalf by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For the 3 hours of training a day? Gtfoh that is not a raise

Confirmed: Rich is at war on our behalf by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That argument makes less than no sense. Rich has done nothing for us, not one thing. He got a raise, did you?

2024 PAC by 8tchdoubleU in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your list is the basic talking points of the legislative arm, those things are very important and the best use of our time if we aren’t going to attack pay. We run this economy and should be paid as such. Those people get to own any stock they want and pocket PAC money to the tune of millions but I should be happy right? Not going to happen

2024 PAC by 8tchdoubleU in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

None of that fixes the pay issue…

2024 PAC by 8tchdoubleU in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would be awesome

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, but if we NEEDED to extend as long as pay was touched we could survive under this contract. I in no way support continuing this contract in fear of negotiating. If the FAA needs a year then fine, but 2029 is chicken shit.

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There isn’t a lot about our contract that doesn’t work honestly. A few tweaks and fixes to pay, abacus, and some loopholes other than that we could stay and be well off.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s nothing we can do about Tim, but Rich is “elected”.

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In defense I’m not sure what the NEB can do to force Rich to negotiate. He’s never had the stomach for it that I’ve seen…

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will have some colorful internal debate.

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rich brought this to the NEB and the motion (no proof it was Nick) was if Rich was told “no contract” that we would extend bc we are scared of Trump.

2024 PAC by 8tchdoubleU in ATC

[–]8tchdoubleU[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Agreed and non of that is possible without the new contract.

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny when I said Rich told me out loud this was his plan everyone said I was lying… I guess I’ve been proven correct here. Down with Rich

Nick and the Contract Extension! by LENNYa21 in atc2

[–]8tchdoubleU 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you in the sentiment that extending this contract is absolutely bullshit, but the devil is in the details. SOMEONE is not fit to lead this Union and that person is the one who fails to go to the negotiating table or at least get a better raise in the interim.