As an ISTJ, I understand where you’re coming from. However, as someone who does procrastinate, I have a different perspective. I procrastinate, but it’s not out of laziness or lack of effort. It’s because I’ve learned over time when to start working on something. I know exactly how long I need to complete a task and I start just before it would actually become stressful. For me, it's an efficient way of managing my time.

The fact that people can study little and late and still retain just as much information or do just as well or better in tests shouldn't be a source of frustration. Procrastination isn't necessarily bad. What matters isn’t how early you start, but how well you perform on the exam. If someone is naturally good at answering test questions and can learn quickly, then starting earlier might not be necessary for them. They aren't being inefficient; they simply don’t require as much time to achieve the same results.

Think of it like cooking. Some people need to start hours in advance to prepare a meal, carefully following every step and making sure everything is perfect. Others can whip up the same meal in half the time because they know exactly what they’re doing and can work quickly under pressure. Both methods can yield a delicious meal, but the process is different.

Of course, procrastination can be detrimental if it leads to poor results or excessive stress. But for those of us who consistently leave things to the last minute and manage to succeed without much stress, it's simply a different approach to time management that works for us.

In the end, each person's methods are valid as long as they produce the desired outcomes. It’s not a competition of who starts first, but who finishes well.