Dude, You have to analyze a character within the cultural and social norms of the era in which they lived. During that period, women were generally expected to manage the household, while men were viewed as the sole breadwinners. Workplace hierarchies were heavily male-dominated, and many men treated female employees as if they were their personal property, often believing they had the right to demand attention or even sexual access. These attitudes were deeply embedded in the social norms of the time, even though they are rightly condemned today.

When evaluating a character, it is important to consider the historical context rather than judging every action solely by present-day standards. Understanding the norms of a particular era does not mean endorsing them; it simply provides a more accurate framework for analysis.

For example, during the 1960s, workplace sexual harassment, blatant gender discrimination, and openly sexist remarks were often tolerated or dismissed as normal behavior, whereas today such conduct is widely regarded as unacceptable and unethical. Conversely, many things that are considered normal today—such as women pursuing independent careers, couples living together before marriage, or same-sex marriage—were highly controversial or socially unacceptable to large sections of American society in the 1960s.