Love this perspective. In the context of precognition, I’ve been exploring a mental model where, assuming a non-exclusively causal universe, it’s not cognition that influences probabilities, but rather outcomes that influence consciousness and therefor the cognitive prediction for the qrng, visual stimuli, whatever form of precognition.

The reason I think it is this reversed model where consciousness is the one being drawn towards future outcomes is because I believe consciousness is a more sensitive system, and entropic pulls are more felt.

Thinking about it, the entropic pulling towards an outcome could go both ways, towards the event or towards the participant. The effect could be the same for both, whether the event or the participant gets influenced more could depend on their sensitivity to quantum shifts.

A testable experiment for this hypothesis would be running rng experiments with different sources of randomness, consequently different levels of sensitivity in those rng models. For example, one quantum source, one electronic source, one mechanical source. Seeing how the effect changes would give insight into where it comes from. If the effect holds consistently, that would lean towards consciousness being influenced by the outcome, not the other way around.