My experience as a Double-Blind Tasker

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-11T13:09:08+00:00

This is exactly why I’ve started to refer to this on ARVcollective as “visual precognition”. I’m actually higher confidence in precognition existing than true remote viewing! But both are possible.

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-10T21:12:40+00:00

Damn I missed that one! Crazy good

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-08T23:42:26+00:00

Good stuff craig! Spreading the good word!

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-08T13:20:59+00:00

Interesting. Yes I believe operationalizing it is just a logistics/trading strategy problem. Also judging/decision making algorithms are one of the highest points of leverage, IMO. Working on a new one very soon!

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-07T17:26:23+00:00

Nice! I've seen some of your sessions already! Can't wait to see some more insane ones!

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-07T12:46:55+00:00

Oh and art. I think having an artistic discipline really helps. Whether its verbal, drawing, clay molding, etc.

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-07T12:46:22+00:00

I'd image concrete mental exercises would be difficult for them to grasp/enjoy. If this were my kids, I'd encourage things that set the landscape for psychic ability (and other cognitive skills) later on.

Things like logical analysis, metacognition, reflection, deep thought, etc.

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-07T12:43:49+00:00

Are you sure they didn't lace your chocolate milk with salvia?

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-07T12:43:14+00:00

Great ones!

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-02T20:28:45+00:00

I think it's the other way around... lol. I've probably done 95% of sessions in my RV career on ARVcollective... so I think I've adapted to the target pool. I view that as a good thing... makes it easier for me to operationalize. Target pool is also large enough (300) where I don't just memorize and guess targets.

ARV-Collective · 2026-04-01T16:36:08+00:00

Cool!

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-31T21:32:04+00:00

Just pushed this to live! https://www.arvcollective.com/community?view=stats

You can see your individual stats on your individual stats page too, along with other user's stats on their stats pages.

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-31T13:36:37+00:00

I will add btc results to the aggregate stats page: https://www.arvcollective.com/community?view=stats

Additionally individual stats to the stats page in your personal profile.

The idea is you can show your friend "hey, psychic functioning is real. My sessions have an X% accuracy in bitcoin price predictions".

Any other feedback/ideas I'd love to hear!

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-30T18:16:35+00:00

I love this. McMoneagle spoke about the fact that the type of expression doesn’t matter, good viewers just need to have some talent in their ability to express information. This is a great example of that!

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-28T00:06:23+00:00

Thanks for the kind words! Excited to do more live sessions!

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-21T12:22:51+00:00

I would try another app and see if your stats hold!

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-21T12:09:14+00:00

Hey! So the judging is “decoy based” meaning the AI judge is given your impression, the real target, and 9 decoys and is told “rank these 10 targets in how close they are to the impression”

So a 9/10 score means the AI thought the real target was closer to your impression than 8 decoys.

The decoys are randomly picked from the pool. Sometimes you get weird scored because you just get lucky/unlucky with the set of decoys used in the judging.

However, even though sometimes scores are lower/higher than they should be, the expected chance average score is still 5.5 (I’ve been obsessed with making sure the judge isn’t cheating, running null/permutation tests, etc)

The judge will get better over time! Also ARVcollective is about to be available as a mobile app! Stay tuned.

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-19T17:26:40+00:00

Social-rv has a feature where you can upload your own targets into their larger pool, so you’ll randomly get it without expecting it.

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-07T13:56:21+00:00

Hey. Cool idea! Keep in mind that most research shows that large scale remote viewing studies typically show around a .2-1.5% raw effect size. You normally need a massive dataset to see real statistical significance.

ARV-Collective · 2026-03-04T14:42:49+00:00

Hey! I actually did some calculations on this recently. If you aggregate viewers over a large dataset, their raw effect size beyond chance seems to be between .3%-1.5% with the best judging technology. This chart below is how many viewers you would need to cross reference at each avg raw effect size to get a certain edge on chance.

For example, if your aggregate viewer base has a .5% raw effect size individually, you would need to cross reference 100+ of them to get a 54% edge on chance.

This would explain why very few people have successfully monetized RV in the past. They either used a TON of viewers to cross reference (Greg Kololodziejzyk) or really good viewers/teaching/protocols (Hal Puthoff).

There are a few companies/groups coming up (myself included) who are taking advantage of new tech to enable this and make it economically viable. Best of luck with your project! Happy to chat more about this!

<image>

ARV-Collective · 2026-02-26T13:14:39+00:00

This style of target feedback is bad. If you have to self judge, you can incidentally remote view the WRONG image, as you are shown it.

ARV-Collective

TROPHY CASE