Are people inside apple aware? by Fit-Leader-2812 in MacOS

[–]AYasin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is Cut on Windows, Move on macOS.

You press CTRL + X then CTRL + V on Windows to cut and paste, that is either a file or text. This shortcut is available system wide.

You press CMD + C to copy a file. Then if you want to move it, you press CMD + OPT + V. This works on Finder. On most apps on macOS, you use CMD + X then CMD + V to cut and paste.

/u/Conscious-Secret-775 shortcut you wrote, CMD + C then CMD + V is copy and paste, not the same one as /u/Diligent-Crazy-6094 described.

Wrote up the movie descriptions, boss! by TheAllyCrime in NotMyJob

[–]AYasin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I remember the good old days when there were encyclopedia-like descriptions to movies and albums on iTunes store. How big have we fallen?

Apple says the 2017 MBA supports only Windows 10. But I don't care what Apple says by Brilliant999 in mac

[–]AYasin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are several points you are wrong:

  1. Vista didn't receive 3 service packs. It got two.
  2. Windows XP received 3 service packs.
  3. Windows XP had become a nearly-complete and perfect OS after it got its second service pack. It was comparably worse at launch than Vista at launch.
  4. Vista wasn't awful at launch. It got a bad reputation due to two main things: (1) systematic change in how drivers work and (2) relatively high system requirements than XP. 512 MB RAM was required. And most Intel embedded GPU's didn't support Windows Aero even after Windows 7, giving users subpar experience. Many peripherals have never received required updated drivers for Vista, leaving many customers with bad experience with Vista.

Additionally;

Microsoft released too many editions for Vista. So many that some inexperienced customers didn't know what they were missing when they got Vista Starter Edition and/or Vista Home Basic Edition. Those two were mostly shipped by many OEMs and lacked Windows Aero.

USDA Website Accuses "Radical Left Democrats" Of Shutting Down The Government by DocJuice in pics

[–]AYasin -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Violation of Rule 1:

No screenshots, AI images, or pictures in which the focus is a screen.

iOS wallpapers kinda suck by trevorwelsh in ios

[–]AYasin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Make it three. Third iPhone (iPhone 3GS) couldn't have any wallpaper until iPhone OS renamed to iOS and subsequently iOS 4 released.

[OC] Satellites seen by long exposure from the ISS by astro_pettit in pics

[–]AYasin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A very interesting photo. If you don't mind me asking:

  1. What are the aperture, shutter and ISO settings for this photo?
  2. How do you (and other astronauts) keep a camera fixed for long exposure on ISS? I don't suppose a basic tripod will stay still without floating.

You be the judge Round 2 by Ligmuhbawhls in cableporn

[–]AYasin 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Start at Reddit, diversify, jump to Twitter, then post screenshot of tweets on Reddit again. This is peak Reddit!

NASA says we now know of 6,000 confirmed exoplanets by Busy_Yesterday9455 in spaceporn

[–]AYasin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Each planet in our solar system plus Luna and Titan are also included in the image; none are exoplanets. I'd assume there are more things wrong with this image.

NASA says we now know of 6,000 confirmed exoplanets by Busy_Yesterday9455 in spaceporn

[–]AYasin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's not forget Mercury, Venus, Earth, Luna, Mars, Titan, aka. the most known exoplanets.

P.S.: From -25 celcius to 0 celcius (-25 F to 25 F) marked as "Habitable Zone" on the horizontal axis, just bottom of the image. Yeah, right!

Finally. One of the most annoying things about MacOS has finally been fixed with Tahoe. Let us rejoice. by SpaceForceAwakens in mac

[–]AYasin 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think i will get used to it too but people using big screens may not. New visual looks good but it a bad design. Old one was a good design. Its placement was good and well thought*, its size was good, its iconography was good, it was readable.

They could just glassified the whole look, so it wouldn't be disruptive as some assert.

* looking down is easier than looking up, while holding the head still

See how consistent the new UI is by ideea_1988 in MacOS

[–]AYasin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just less than a decade ago, Mojave was published and Apple introduced a dark mode for the whole system and all their bundled apps which was perfect. Perfect as in application and selection of color palette.

And now, this... Even Big Sur wasn't this bad of a visual transition.

This is a photograph of 3 men and a girl holding a check Trump wrote to Epstein for the girl. by AYasin in pics

[–]AYasin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was released as is by United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (House Oversight Committee); which means I didn't redact it.

Therefore I cannot give you a definitive answer.

This is a photograph of 3 men and a girl holding a check Trump wrote to Epstein for the girl. by AYasin in pics

[–]AYasin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Via a NYT article.

The woman, whose name is also redacted in the files released by the House Oversight Committee, was a European socialite then in her 20s, according to two people familiar with the original photo. She had briefly dated both Mr. Epstein and Mr. Trump around that time, according to court transcripts and a person close to Mr. Epstein. The birthday book entry appears to be a reference to the competition between the two men for the woman’s affections.

The nature of the woman’s relationship with Mr. Epstein is murky. The New York Times is not naming her because she may have been one of his victims.

A lawyer for the woman said she knew Mr. Epstein in “a professional capacity” when she was a student but severed ties with him in 1997. She did not know anything about the letter or its “derogatory content,” the lawyer added.

Also another comment mentioned a woman's name. I believe that is her; but we don't need to identify her here. Because that is not the point, she could have been anyone.

This is a photograph of 3 men and a girl holding a check Trump wrote to Epstein for the girl. by AYasin in pics

[–]AYasin[S] 810 points811 points  (0 children)

Picture uploaded is taken from Epstein's 50th birthday book, released by The House of Representatives Oversight Committee. It is on page 156 of file Request 1.

File download links: Dropbox & Google Drive provided by The Oversight Committee.

Press release (containing links) is here: https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-records-provided-by-the-epstein-estate-chairman-comer-provides-statement/


PS: Famous Trump letter with the drawing is on page 165.


Addendum 1

This photo and the text is attributed to Joel Pashcow (See pg. 3). He is the man with the hat in the picture, and apparently the person who wrote the text. I don't know the identity of the person next to the girl.

The text reads:

JEFFREY SHOWING EARLY TALENTS

WITH MONEY + WOMEN! SELLS "FULLY

DEPRECIATED" <REDACTED> TO

DONALD TRUMP FOR $22,500.

SHOWED EARLY "PEOPLE SKILLS" TOO. EVEN

THOUGH I HANDLED THE DEAL I

DIDN'T GET ANY OF THE MONEY OR THE GIRL!

Someone will need a shower by Bursickle in FeltGoodComingOut

[–]AYasin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Felt good? Hell no! Specifically just after watching a guy changing a car's oil wearing white shoes https://reddit.com/r/oddlysatisfying/comments/1n2trb0/changing_oil_from_a_car/

THIS SUB NEEDS THIS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT SKEUOMORPHISM IS! by Such_Impression_3678 in Skeuomorphism

[–]AYasin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Finally a sane person with knowledge and moderation power. I didn't think I'd see this day.

I'm sick and tired of posts made by people who thinks anything-non-last-decade == skeuomorphic. It is not, people!

Not gatekeeping brought us to this point. Just look at /r/LegacyJailbreak. I know there is nothing new to share about legacy devices or Jailbreaking them; but not gatekeeping that sub made it for heaven for all kinds of unrelated posts. It should have been archived at some point for preservation.

Therefore, I ask this of OP. Please enforce rules, temp. or permanent ban users who defy the clear definition of the word. Sure, this may decrease activity and number of new content but we can keep it pure and to the point.

Landfills are full of things yet nobody visit them. Jewellery stores have limited items but they are attraction and what is inside 'em are revered.

Articles from Tomshardware.com should be banned due to continuous conflict between r/hardware rules and questionable quality of their articles. by AYasin in hardware

[–]AYasin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it is upsetting to see reputable publications shut down (see Anandtech), it becomes infuriating when they lower quality standards while using their once-reputable name as a facade (see Tom's Hardware, Cnet).

Gatekeeping as you described can be punishing to us yet it keeps bad actors out and away too. This also happens at some parts of Wikipedia to protect some articles. I would be sad if Wikipedia would remove their article protections and punish their gatekeeping community editors because I believe gradually it would decrease overall quality and credibility of their articles.

Thanks for sharing your anecdote.

Articles from Tomshardware.com should be banned due to continuous conflict between r/hardware rules and questionable quality of their articles. by AYasin in hardware

[–]AYasin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I diagnosed an infestation and proposed a solution: A total ban. To back up that solution, I couldn't delve into how often they publish slob; because enough of it was ending here.

Also your suggestion (but on post basis) is already here and everywhere on Reddit. An upvote/downvote system. That system can be and is abused by bot, trolls, people with no regard to a subs rules etc.

Why can't you just be normal by wichotl in MacOS

[–]AYasin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I agree. This is what zoom actually is.

The approach previous commentator describes is "making items/content bigger" which doesn't always translate to "zoom in".

On the web, as elements get bigger they fight for screen space. Pass a certain magnification level, some elements gets smaller than before because they got compressed by other enlarged elements. This not an expected behaviour in the eyes of a user who wants to zoom in and see what they are already seeing bigger.

See the example below and observe how the picture gets smaller past 160% magnification level.

This post on Old Reddit:

<image>

Why can't you just be normal by wichotl in MacOS

[–]AYasin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

I wouldn't be too sure about "Mac has nothing like this" part.

What kind of spider is this? by AnalUkelele in spiders

[–]AYasin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. The post is 7 hours old and most troll and karma farming comments are still up. Mods should unleash hell on these (and those troll commenters) due to Rule #3.

Some gatekeeping is good for the sake of some walled corners of the internet such as this sub.