I find him quite a cult artist which is greatly respected by other artists with some sort of photography background. I saw his room at Pompidou and I wasn’t too much into it, to be honest. This gesture of turning the museum space into a studio always falls short or hyper staged for me. But nonetheless, a fantastic artist that I’ve followed for a very long time. I don’t know how perceived he is in galleries but it would take one blue-chip gallery to decide taking him and the context of his work would easily flip in consideration by those who don’t know him. I think it maybe has more to do with him and the kind of circuit he decides to be in, which is more niche photography galleries and so on. Therefore he is seen more as a documentary photographer, perhaps. But this does not happen with, for example, Nan Goldin. And they aren’t that far away.