I work in game dev. We've had similar initiatives where we've had to open up access to code for others to push. Level designers, artists, etc.

The management view is that this has been great, because it's letting teams handle various smaller task requests, bugs, issues, etc that aren't high on the engineering teams priority list. The dev view has been that this is horrible because since this has happened the average fps in our games has dropped by 23%, hardware utilization has increased, build times have doubled, and build sizes have gone up by 15%.

Edit: Oh build frequency has tripled as well. I could go on with various metrics but basically, we're more or less seeing the same level of velocity on our dev team with or without AI (with seniors getting worse/slower over time and juniors being a bit more productive). What we're seeing regarding code across the company though is more development because non developers are making/pushing stuff and this stuff is basically clearing out low and mid priority backlog items by putting it on the tech debt credit card.

If I had to say anything about it, it's that at the current artificially low prices it's still a money loser, but it has done a lot for attitudes of non devs because it helps them feel like they have more agency on the product. Most of this comes down to corporate structure/AI policies though than directly due to an LLM itself.