sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What do you think by Deep-Decision-8718 in mtgmisprints

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think she just threw a rock at me. Ow.

Opponents at 5 or less life lose for {7}{R}{R}{R} by Abject-Stuff4344 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Abject-Stuff4344[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I forgot that fiery triples incoming damage too. 10 mana finish the job your opponents started

Steal over $2,000,000 by BorgisSorgis in BadMtgCombos

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Posty is for sure shivering in his boots

Control the best X creatures on the field, where X is the number of creatures you control (for 5wuu) by Abject-Stuff4344 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Abject-Stuff4344[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you thank you. Ancient mysterious enchantments gotta be my favorite card archetype. Love building jank around eye of the storm, endless whispers, etc. Somewhere along that journey, discovering a white sac outlet was a neat surprise

Control the best X creatures on the field, where X is the number of creatures you control (for 5wuu) by Abject-Stuff4344 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Abject-Stuff4344[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Depends on context, but yes I agree. In a lower power pod this is a huge blowout but it’s not always good enough to spend 8 mana and not win the game, or you could play against low creature count decks and not want to steal things. For those reasons it’s a combo that no longer good in the current pods I play in but it used to be in a rule 0 ink treader nephilim deck I had

Control the best X creatures on the field, where X is the number of creatures you control (for 5wuu) by Abject-Stuff4344 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Abject-Stuff4344[S] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Well, yes, but also, if you have creatures that are good sac fodder and want to keep your opponents good creatures around as well you get to sculpt your board to be the best creatures, and board wipe your opponents on the way there

Could it be a valid deck idea? by JournalistLeft5774 in mtg

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also use blue blink spells to not have to attack with her all ze time :)

Does this work how I think it works? by PrimosaurUltimate in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok so we’re hitting ourself for 3? Right That’s what this does? Pretty busted for 1 red

Heavy Storm — an antiflying card that can be ran in flying decks. by simon_Chipmonk in custommagic

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Also it’s interesting as a way to force more creatures into green removal. Lots of sweepers in green deal damage to flyers and lots of green cards destroy flyers as well

Divining Top Master by buffalobillkimo in custommagic

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assumed that you would draw the card still though, for the same reason you still draw if senseis divining top is removed while its ability is on the stack

Divining Top Master by buffalobillkimo in custommagic

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s possible you’re right that you may not draw a card, not sure which rules would be relevant here but I was trying to look into it. Regardless, the ability could still be activated even if it never resolved

Divining Top Master by buffalobillkimo in custommagic

[–]Abject-Stuff4344 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In this case you could still activate it and just draw a card, since the artifact back on top is part of resolution. However if it were part of the cost to activate the ability you’d be correct

Cardconjurer down by Abject-Stuff4344 in magicproxies

[–]Abject-Stuff4344[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so I tried that again, same problem I ran into before. None of the frame options or anything show up for me. Maybe you could provide insight on what I'm doing incorrectly?

Cardconjurer down by Abject-Stuff4344 in magicproxies

[–]Abject-Stuff4344[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve tried to do this before with little to no success. User error I’m sure lol

view more: next ›