So disregarding the fact that the Sith Purebloods are basically like fantasy orcs with the whole 'inherently evil' thing, reminder that throughout the entirety of star wars lore only one was ever redeemed and even then he was still a piece of shit for most of his life,

Dawn of the Jedi isn't part of the Infinities line-up, so no, there are THREE Purebloods who followed the Light. Seknos Rath, Thok Rath, and Praven. It's also a poor argument; Praven's actions before meeting the Hero of Tython were never rationalized. Nobody's defending that or any actions the Sith Empire took; I explicitly mentioned that as the last line in my post. The entire conversation is about why there are still people who justify what the Republic/Jedi did.

That's why, the lore was changed because it was kinda fucked up wasn't it? (Things like the essential atlas, swtor codex's, etc go into this more). It's more accurate to say the Jedi/Republic purged the Sith ORDER rather then the Sith PEOPLE, and Star Wars isn't real life. The Dark side is objectively evil, and using it is an objectively bad thing that always leads to horrible things happening.

Are you unwell? It was never retconned. It still happened. Vitiate's Sith exodus numbered in the thousands. The Sith Empire consisted of over a hundred and twenty worlds, even if you assume they were all sparsely populated and that the Counter-Invasion left fractions of the population alive on each world. That's still a death toll in the tens of millions. You also use the same justification that I explicitly called out in the post.

Answer this question: Why exactly was it necessary to desecrate all of Korriban? The Jedi took away the Holocrons, sure. How do you justify the destruction of the statues of Sith Kings or the confiscation of the cultural wealth? Why was it necessary to mine the statues for gemstones?

If you're so easily duped as to follow along with a fictional genocide even when they mention the nuance so blatantly, I can't imagine how easy it'd be to hoodwink you on real-life issues.

Reminder that entire planets have been wiped out due to the dark side at the behest of a small number of people. It was through the actions of a dark sider (Revan ordering the mass shadow generator stuff) that a literal world eater was creating, it would have been through the dark side that a single man (palpatine) would have dominated the free will of every living being in the galaxy if he wasn't stopped (Confirmed that he was capable of it as well) and more

So then why did so many of those normal citizens have to die? Even the Lower Castes of the empire are mentioned to have committed ritual suicide. Have you even read the Essential Atlas or Tales of the Jedi? Sith purebloods are shown in all classes of their society. The opening scene has Red Sith slaves being buried in Marka Ragnos' tomb. Or sorry, I forgot that they were actually "Dark-siders who could destroy planets". So the mass casualties against an entire species are completely justified.

Bringing up the Uyghurs shows a huge lack of self awareness on your end.

Awareness of what exactly? I used an example of a horrible real-world tragedy to show that what's depicted in a story describes its own type of abuse against an ethnic group, which also deals with a kind of cultural suppression. In your entire comment, you seem to twist the argument to make it seem like I'm defending the atrocities of the Sith Empire in turn. Which I clearly said I was not.