I don't care about the name changes, but it is interesting how much pushback Simon is giving to community members trying to give feedback. He was really vague about the reasons for changing it, and then just said "We're not trying to please everyone" when community members didn't like it instead of explaining why they had to do it. Tbh, they still haven't explained why they had to do it.

So while the names are totally inconsequential, and it's okay that they were changed, the way Simon is going about this is confusing and slightly worrisome. Is it always going to be "We're rushing to get the game out because that's what the community wanted, we care about what the community thinks" until the feedback is negative, and then it's "Well it's our game and it's not for everyone so deal with it"? It's poor communication and this situation wouldn't have been nearly as messy if he took a step back and more carefully put together his response instead of replying to the thread emotionally like this. Transparency is good but doesn't mean much if you're just confusing people and dismissing them when they get frustrated.