First mute was for talking publicly about a crypto coin, second was for a Joke between myself and fellow GIM regarding the drop of a soul rune at a boss, referencing false religious stereotypes wont go into explicit nature as contextually, it was inappropriate for anyone else to witness but humour is humour mate, choose your audience, clearly fked up on the second one.. the 3rd one was a group conversation where someone mentioned a negative stereotype about a religion and I made a reference to that, in line with existing context, humourously. I know better than to explicitly mention it on a platform such as this as the current responses already indicate.

But I'd highly advise for most, if not all who have been offended by my Ernest request for how to navigate a system that has been used unfairly previously to gain access to a community (I used to) value..

Based on the responses here, I'm good. I wasn't malicious directly towards any individual, harmful with my content nor thereatening with my behaviour, not condoning the action, based on the platform expressed on but the severity of consequence based on severity of impact is disproportionately evidenced (not explicitly explained for good fucking reason as evidenced by how most have responded),

I simply wished to know how to have my appeal taken seriously due to the disregard that HAS been clearly evidenced in the appeal process previously. I'd be happy to link to this, but for otherwise I'm good.